Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So the tax deduction for the individual somehow winds up into a "citizens in need" account???


1 posted on 02/14/2019 11:15:57 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Public-Private..... in other words the private equity takes the risk and the public guys tell them what they can’t do.


2 posted on 02/14/2019 11:24:33 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“public private partnerships” are another form of cronyism.

Various parts of each become political or financial (or both) beneficiaries, supplicants, donors, and self-serving defenders of some part of the other side.

What is needed is fewer taxes and fewer tax dollars, leaving more money in the private markets to begin with, so there is less need for “social services” as more private jobs will be created.

What the GOP needs to do in Connecticut is to offer bills for getting the government out of the way of private enterprise, NOT how better to politically get into bed with it.


3 posted on 02/14/2019 11:25:58 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Fasano described a new state income tax deduction for charitable contributions that would go into a “citizens in need” account within the state Department of Social Services’ budget.


Another tax.

Charity should be personal, not institutionalized.


4 posted on 02/14/2019 11:26:01 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson