Posted on 02/03/2019 5:20:18 AM PST by Kaslin
Cleansing ourselves - a uniquely Puritanical concept. Except, this time ironically coming from a leftist individual who likely eschews most of what would be considered traditional Biblical morality. When every form of perversion becomes acceptable, liberals must signal their virtue by righteously condemning what has now become the gravest of sins. And conservatives, fearing the backlash, more often than not join right in. And so the policing of the New Morality becomes even more strict than the old ever was.
Heres a concept. Even taking into account the Michael Jackson skin darkening episode to which Northam HAS admitted and apologized for - an action Milbank still thinks disqualifies him the same as sexual assault and preying on children would - what if Ralph Northam is simply someone who made a mistake many years ago and has tried to atone for it, albeit wrong-headedly (because news flash: going liberal is NEVER the way to atone for past racial sins), ever since?When a black-and-white picture that appeared below Virginia Governor Ralph Northams 1984 medical school yearbook page - of a bowtied man in blackface standing next to a white-robed member of the Ku Klux Klan - starting making the media rounds on Friday, it struck me at first like the most ridiculously cartoonish of fake news. Here was the Democratic governor of Virginia - by all accounts heretofore a good Leftist who openly advocates for every liberal issue under the sun including, of late, borderline infanticide - potentially being caught up in a racial controversy that would make Robert Byrd blush.
It was almost too surreal to be true, too seemingly contrived to not be a made-up meme from the bowels of the right-wing internet. But time told the tale soon enough. Was the picture real? Turns out, it was. Was the picture actually under Northams yearbook page? For sure. Was Northam actually in the picture, either in blackface or a KKK robe? Well, that one is a little more up in the air, especially after the Virginia governors Saturday press conference denying it. Whether or not Northams vehement denials are enough to raise more than a reasonable doubt in the minds of Virginians is yet to be seen, but regardless, the die has been cast. Make no mistake, Ralph Northams days as governor of Virginia are quickly coming to an end.
Now at this point, the narrative for me as a non-left-wing columnist might typically be to demonstrate the difference between Good Democrat Ralph Northams situation and that of, well, pretty much anyone right of center, like Iowa Rep. Steve King. Surely, there is a double-standard, right? Theyve obviously existed in the past. But in this case, while a cynic might say liberals have nothing to gain by replacing Northam with the even more liberal Justin Fairfax, the quick response from Democrats and liberals of every stripe, from Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi to Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and the NAACP, suggests at least an increasing willingness to finally police their own.
So now everyone is being policed, at least when it comes to real or perceived racial sins, no matter how egregious or how far removed from the present. Do you feel safer? I know I do! Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank celebrated this fact in a Saturday column, contending that, while Northam has lived an admirable life of late and likely considers losing it all because of an almost 35-year-old transgression unfair, thats just the way it should be.
But some things should disqualify people from public service a Nazi salute, sexual assault, preying on children and, yes, dressing as a Klansman or in blackface and it doesnt matter if it happened 35 years ago, Milbank wrote.
So, a home invader can be the governor of Virginia, but Northam cant? To be clear, I am not in any way excusing or condoning the use of blackface in any era. Its insensitive, horrific, and it should be condemned, but if someone honestly doesnt see a moral difference between preying on children and a politically-incorrect party-gone-WAAAAAY-wrong, ones morals are, shall we say, highly suspect.
But these are the New Puritans were dealing with here, people for whom real or perceived racial sins - and they get to determine what those are - are the worst sins ever, basically the same as raping a woman or preying on a child. And so, Milbank celebrates the fact that Megyn Kelly lost her job at NBC (does Milbank believe Jimmy Fallon, Jimmy Kimmel, and Sarah Silverman are also equivalent to child predators? Apparently, some of that old double-standard does exist!) for seemingly defending blackface and laments Florida Governor Ron DeSantis electoral win despite the fact that he simply said the common phrase monkey this up.
Then, he blamed it on Trump, because of course he did.
Some might think this all a witch hunt, to use the presidents term of art, but it is, at least in part, a salutary backlash against what Trump represents, Milbank wrote. Appalled by his racism, his vulgarity and his appalling treatment of women, we are reacting by holding public officials (and hopefully ourselves) to a higher standard. We are cleansing ourselves for the sins of Trump.
"Cleansing ourselves - a uniquely Puritanical concept. Except, this time ironically coming from a leftist individual who likely eschews most of what would be considered traditional Biblical morality. When every form of perversion becomes acceptable, liberals must signal their virtue by righteously condemning what has now become the gravest of sins. And conservatives, fearing the backlash, more often than not join right in. And so the policing of the New Morality becomes even more strict than the old ever was.
Heres a concept. Even taking into account the Michael Jackson skin darkening episode to which Northam HAS admitted and apologized for - an action Milbank still thinks disqualifies him the same as sexual assault and preying on children would - what if Ralph Northam is simply someone who made a mistake many years ago and has tried to atone for it, albeit wrong-headedly (because news flash: going liberal is NEVER the way to atone for past racial sins), ever since?
TRue.
The left continually redefines the meaning of words so that they have a fresh cudgel to attack their political opponents
Quick get racism back on the front page! We’re losing the narrative! Get me some YEARBOOKS... NOW! Democrat, republican, whatever...I don’t care! Shiny object time!
To be clear, I am not in any way excusing or condoning the use of blackface in any era. Its insensitive, horrific,
No it isnt. It just plain isnt. Even as a kid I thought it too stupid to be funny, you know, like a Jerry Lewis movie, but “horrific”? No.
Is there some reason why people keep repeating this line?
You guys know people can converse about more than one thing at a time.....do you?
Most Americans are not political...they react to headlines. The infanticide conversation was taken off the big headlines. Back to racism and get this governor out of there before he starts talking about killing babies again.
Northam is racist scum.
Shameful anti-Gillespie campaign ad by Latino Victory Fund
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=SHZvVsGGY-U
Can you see what is wrong with this picture? Can you see the sleight of hand?
Killing babies? No problem.
Allegedly (i.e. unproven as yet) appearing in blackface as a teenage? Burn him at the stake.
Northam is a baby killer. That's infinitely worse than being a racist.
This buds for you MFs!
I could not read the article.
The blackface is a diversion To follow it is stupid
He described killing a baby by means that are legal but subject to better scrutiny by we the people who refuse to use our power to look at it and stop it but have the power to stop it if we look at it as this dupe of a governor invited us to do
As soon as this came out some operative scrambled to find anything on this guy to get him off the stage and permanently.
We must talk about the innocent lives left to die after theyve been mutilated at the demand of their own parents.
We are allowing it by allowing it to be legal
By talking about blackface costumes in a decades old picture. A non issue
Are we the people in charge? Or not?
Lets consider the issue and not allow the media to change the subject
legal infanticide is the issue not a thirty year old photo
Is prefer he stay around. Keep the Lt gov there who is a leftist loon
Sen Byrd was pro abortion That is the difference.
To pretend this is about anything other than getting this guy to be quiet about killing babies is ignorant
Most Americans are not political...they react to headlines. The infanticide conversation was taken off the big headlines. Back to racism and get this governor out of there before he starts talking about killing babies again
Why is anyone on this forum talking about this yearbook photo?
We want to know....... is the person in the KKK robes his wife?
Just imagine 56 million babies in this country alone have been killed by their own parents son after birth lift to die suffering reaching for their parents
Ditto here. The reactions of people in their feigned indignity is sickening. People have their "breath taken away" or are "brought to tears." This thought policing is dangerous stuff.
The guy in photo in post 3 is not Northam. Its a classmate and that photo is from some class group of which Northam was the president.
The KKK outfit person is much shorter than the guy in black face. Im thinking that might actually have been his date, a female.
We need Northam to stay where he is. Then over the next weeks and months we dig up the michael Jackson picture of Northam. Maybe theres video. He continues to stick his foot in his mouth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.