Posted on 02/01/2019 7:17:12 PM PST by KierkegaardMAN
...From his rambling rhetoric, untutored diction, and scant intellectual formation, we may assume that Governor Cuomo has escaped the brush of Lord Actons aphorism that power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Cuomos power may not be absolute, although it has now proven deadly, but even power that is not absolute enjoys a blithe courtship with vice. His official website now displays the cook with whom he shares a home in a relationship that would have exercised John the Baptist...
(Excerpt) Read more at crisismagazine.com ...
And this writer criticizes others about their grammar?
Great and well-written article.
It is a traditional rule of English that the article ‘an’ can be used before words that begin with an H sound if the first syllable of that word is not stressed. Indeed, some traditionalists would say it must be used before such words.
The rule is "a" before a consonant and "an" before a vowel or a word starting with a vowel sound (like "M" in MBA).
This authors usage sounds pretentious at best and erroneous at worst.
The good father can write.
I certainly hope Trump addresses the new NY law and the attempted 3rd trimester abortion law in Virginia in the SOTU. Early word is that he will.
The barbarity of intentionally killing a viable child because of the mother’s alleged mental anguish leaves decent people speechless.
This is why they have adoption. Can’t handle a child - fine; we all get that; but there are so many families waiting for an adopted child - don’t take it out on a defenseless infant.
re: “And this writer criticizes others about their grammar? “
Maybe his version of Grammarly was at fault?
BTW, I should have also added in my corrective post upthread that in addition to an "a" being used before a word starting with a consonant, it should also be used before a word starting with a vowel if that vowel sounds like a consonant (like the word "unicorn"...starting with a "yu" sound).
I usually adhere to that "no FR posts after mid-night or before 5:00 a.m. rule). Couldn't sleep last night.;-)
The child in your womb IS NOT YOURS!
It is abhorrent for one human to OWN another. You don’t OWN that 100% separate and distinct individual. DNA says so!
You have no “right” to MURDER that 100% separate and distinct individual.
That person has a beating heart and brain activity (at 20 + DAYS). They could not be terminated if just ONE of those were present in an adult.
Human life begins at conception. PERIOD.
It is time for a constitution amendment to end this infanticide.
As far as rape and incest go... the child has nothing to do with either!
TWO wrongs don’t make a right.
I had the opportunity to eat dinner with Fr. Rutler. I asked him if he listened to Rush Limbaugh and he said, “Oh my yes. That is a good and very knowledgable man.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.