Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chico’s mass overdose highlights severe new phase of opioid epidemic
sfchronicle ^ | 1/21/2019 | erin alday

Posted on 01/21/2019 9:42:27 AM PST by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: bitt
Turn out the lights
The party's over

41 posted on 01/21/2019 11:41:03 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt; GailA; Chode; All

Thanks for the Post.

Ping

IT’S NOT THE DRUGS !!! IT’S DRUG JUNKIES!!!!

Stop saving them and thin the Herd.


42 posted on 01/21/2019 11:51:36 AM PST by mabarker1 (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
👍good choice
43 posted on 01/21/2019 12:43:09 PM PST by easternsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1
they are NOT victims!!!
44 posted on 01/21/2019 2:16:45 PM PST by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

>They executed the addicts as well as the suppliers and after a while the problem was not all that severe anymore.

This has also been suggested as a solution to poverty, genetic diseases, general discontent etc. It is usually a cure worse than the problem.


45 posted on 01/21/2019 3:04:08 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The fentanyl overdose epidemic has one cause: the government crackdown on legal, pure, pharmaceutical grade opioids. Drug laws did not exist until 1906 and most of the Founding Fathers were users. The federal government had no legal basis to ban any drug without a constitutional amendment until the New Deal Supreme Court decision Wickard v Filburn (1942) usurped the power to regulate everything. Drugs are a natural and originalist constitutional right, not a crime.


46 posted on 01/21/2019 3:16:15 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politically Correct

There are those on this forum who condemn the natural as deadly, and categorically extol the wonders of technology.

I prefer Nature whenever possible. Which is why I have never even tried drugs. Not once.


47 posted on 01/21/2019 3:24:17 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

As a Christian, I oppose intoxication; however, I will concede that truly natural drugs are less dangerous than some of these artificial ones.

Having said that:

1. You did not prove that “most” of the Founding Fathers were “users”: Define what constituted a user, and who did what.

2. You fail to note the enormous profit incentive in synthetically producing artificial (not natural), and therefore patentable, drugs. That is how Big Pharma got BIG!


48 posted on 01/21/2019 3:32:16 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bob Ireland

thankfully, its mostly whites it seems that are dying....as planned...


49 posted on 01/21/2019 10:23:08 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I do not think it is quite that simple. The recovering addict remains in a state of recovery forever; he is never cured. The factors that lead to relapse could be anything. I can envision a situation in which someone who has been “clean” for decades has some bad life experiences which weaken his resolve to control the addiction, and he goes right back into use. It also is not a matter of him making an active effort to go procure drugs. Drug users often offer drugs to others, unsolicited.

Drug addiction is a brain disorder. The only real choice is at the beginning, when one makes that decision to try it. After that, the addiction sets in and one can only fight against it. The fight never ends.

One scientist told me that his motivation for going into research was that when he was a little boy, he knew an addict who had been clean for twenty years. The addict had dedicated his life to helping others learn to control their addictions. Then one day the “former” addict disappeared—he had died of an overdose. This left a strong impression on my colleague.

Scientists are actively studying addiction and trying to better understand the addictive process. Until we can do that and come up with a way to truly treat the addiction, keeping addicts from relapsing is always going to be a challenge, one we fail much too often.


50 posted on 01/22/2019 4:24:08 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson