Getting just a little, ahem, repetitive, aren't you?
I'd call that p*ss*ng on the thread, clearly a form of abuse, especially when we consider the following:
But the question remains whether FLT-bird or others have raised issues which were not yet adequately addressed?
My answer is: possibly, and my intentions are to answer them, as best as they can be answered with whatever time I might have to spend on it.
Now Free Republic's unwritten rules (unwritten so far as I know) say, if I'm going to discuss FLT-bird's posts, then I have to include FLT-bird in my addressee list, so I will, even at risk of FLT-bird increasing his own post count by **repetitively** complaining about mine. ;-)
Your repetitive responding to respond in order to waste as much time as possible while failing to read and/or just claiming any source that is inconvenient for your arguments is automatically untrue, has likewise come to an end. Buh Bye.
14th attempt.
Sooner or later you’re going to realize that you are simply not going to steal hours of my day every day by posting your same old obsessive BS.
I posted 10% of the responses on this thread? I really need to get a life.
Just out of curiosity, did you happen to note how many of those posts were is response to a factual inaccuracy that FLT-bird posted? I'm just curious.