BJK: “who’s the “troll” if you’re posting data you can’t really certify, even when challenged on it?”
FLT-bird: ***”Oh but I have - several times.
The troll is the one who tries to keep playing the same game I outlined above - as though we’d never seen trolling before and were going to fall for that one.”***
I’ve seen many places on this thread where FLT-bird claimed to have posted data, quotes, etc.
I can’t recall any place where you actually did, or even posted a reference back to your previous quote posting, i.e., “See my post # 123 above”.
As the poet said, “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
FLT-bird: ***”The fact is that virtually everything under the category of PC Revisionist Myth is supsect challenged and often dismissed by serious historians.
Most of it was wartime propaganda and its immediate aftermath which was not “rediscovered” until the current crop of 60’s Leftists started the long march through the institutions.”***
Noooooo, the Civil War is the most written about subject in America, with litterally libraries full of books these past 150+ years.
How many support Lost Cause Myths, is it 1% or .1%?
A small number.
The rest use credible sources to write real history, from the beginning.
That’s not to say some historians don’t disagree, of course they do, always will.
But the pack of lies which falls in the category of “Lost Cause Myth” is not history, never was, never will be.
And here’s why: whatever parts are true are real history, whatever is lies is Lost Cause Myth.
I’ve seen many places on this thread where FLT-bird claimed to have posted data, quotes, etc.
I can’t recall any place where you actually did, or even posted a reference back to your previous quote posting, i.e., “See my post # 123 above”.
As the poet said, “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
LOL! As if this were the first thread on the subject....as if you and I had not posted back and forth 100+ times already. It is I who think the lady doth protest too much.
Noooooo, the Civil War is the most written about subject in America, with litterally libraries full of books these past 150+ years.
How many support Lost Cause Myths, is it 1% or .1%?
A small number.
The rest use credible sources to write real history, from the beginning.
Pure fantasy. The majority opinion of PC Revisionist Academia today was not the majority view even within Academia a generation ago. The “its all about slavery” mantra really got going again in the 1980s after having been dismissed as the laughable propaganda it was generations earlier.
That’s not to say some historians don’t disagree, of course they do, always will.
But the pack of lies which falls in the category of “Lost Cause Myth” is not history, never was, never will be.
Its the pack of lies that falls under the category of PC Revisionism that is not history, never was and never will be. Notice how its invariably the hardcore Leftists who push this line of BS?
And here’s why: whatever parts are true are real history, whatever is lies is Lost Cause Myth.
Real history are the facts and quotes and sources I’ve provided numerous times. PC Revisionist lies and propaganda are the “its all about slavery” and virtuous North myths.