Then name them.
You failed again and you’re going to fail every time you try this most basic of trolling gambits.
I'm just trying to establish that you're making claims without any supporting documentation, and it appears I'm being very successful at that.
In fact, DoodleDawg is a scholar, or at least "history buff" of considerable learning, more adept at arcane details of historiography than pretty much any of us here, certainly in a class with rustbucket.
So DoodleDawg's challenge for FLT-bird to support his claims with real data is not a "troll", but rather in the interest of simple historical accuracy.
Now it appears that FLT-bird doesn't really have the "goods" and so huffs & puffs to blow smoke in our faces.