Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem
Consent obtained by threats is not consent.

Exactly the point I make about the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments.

1,229 posted on 02/25/2019 10:27:48 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1228 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
“Exactly the point I make about the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments.”

You and I have been consistent: consent obtained by coercion is not consent. There was a time when none denied it.

We must continue to repeat this point until everyone that totes a smart phone understands.

1,230 posted on 02/25/2019 1:57:08 PM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1229 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp; jeffersondem; rockrr
jeffersondem: "Consent obtained by threats is not consent."

DiogenesLamp: "Exactly the point I make about the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments."

rockrr: "So you’re still in favor of keeping slavery alive. Good to know..."

jeffersondem: "That is an interesting comment.
May we see your data?"

Clearly our Lost Causers, typical Democrats, wish to have it both ways on this.
On the one hand they deny the 13th, 14th & 15th were legitimately ratified, on the other they claim to support emancipation and citizenship for former slaves.

The key facts they ignore are:

  1. The 13th, 14th & 15th were lawfully ratified by representatives of legal voters at the time.
    Those voters included former slaves but excluded former Confederates.

  2. In early 1865 what Lincoln called a "pernicious abstraction" argued Confederate state ratifications were no longer necessary.
    That would reduce the requirement to 19 states.
    But in the end, all 36 states of the time ratified.

  3. Congress passed laws requiring former Confederate states to ratify before sending representatives to Congress.

  4. The 13th, 14th & 15th were eventually ratified by every state which originally rejected them and no state today remains in opposition to them.
Bottom line: "consent of the governed" depends on who, exactly, is asked to consent.
Slaves were never asked to consent to slavery and Confederates were not asked to consent to abolition at the time.
Today descendants of slaveholders are free to withdraw their states' ratifications of the 13th, 14th & 15th at any time and yet none -- zero, zilch, nada, not one -- has ever chosen to do so.
Nor, so far as I've seen, has any Lost Causer here suggested it.

In my opinion that qualifies as "consent of the governed."

1,234 posted on 02/26/2019 5:34:26 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson