It's all really much more complex than what I'm prepared to post, right now.
Anyway, I wonder what part of my post was wrong. I agree I used a sarcastic tone in it (based on many people usually commenting on something they dont only understand but cannot understand - you do seem to know the country though), and if I was not jet lagged and on a short connection stop I would have been more attentive to decorum and propriety.
But I dont think I said anything that is not factual. I genuinely think it is a powder keg, I think there is a whole host of catalysts and reagents that can trigger a reaction, I think the seeds were planted a long time ago during the decades of apartheid, I think most blacks there will never feel fully there, and the resentment just gets bigger as the country gets ever richer and all the poor blacks see is brownouts, lack of opportunities, etc.
Another thing by the way I find funny is that there is an entire generation of youth that have grown up without apartheid. That is a big danger! Why? Because the older folk - even when they suffer and rail their fists on power cuts and no water and no whatever - can always say that at least they are free (silent chuckle from me). They can at least say they have self governance and can try and glean some little comfort from that (slightly less silent chuckle).
But the young folk - nothing to compare and contrast. All they see is mostly lack without a backdrop, and many of the supporters of firebrands railing against the whites are young. The youth are the rabble.
Anyways, I should have been less sarcastic ...but theres nothing I said that I would take back. Maybe nuance it better, but the resentment is bad.