Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sparklite2
...A distinction without a difference...

Not true. There is a huge difference.

In order to listen to phone calls law enforcement must have a warrant, which requires a Judge's signature and "probable cause".

Text messages require only a subpoena, which does not require probable cause, and an administrative subpoena can be obtained without any Judge ever seeing it. Phone companies are happy to oblige with a complete transcript of your texts.

If a matter is at all delicate, call, don't text. Don't have any "delicate" matters? Think again. Have you ever sent a text to your tax preparer? How about an attorney? Or maybe just a nastygram you later wish you had not sent?

I suspect someone in federal law enforcement told the state that if they taxed texts as telecommunications, they would open the door to the argument that they need a warrant to obtain texts.

30 posted on 12/16/2018 9:56:13 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: CurlyDave

Thank you.


32 posted on 12/16/2018 10:11:02 PM PST by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: CurlyDave

If the matter is delicate, meet in person with music playing and leave your cellphones out in the car.


39 posted on 12/17/2018 5:58:00 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson