Posted on 12/13/2018 6:46:15 AM PST by SleeperCatcher
Discovery: The federal judge overseeing special counsel Robert Muellers case against President Donald Trumps short-lived national security adviser, Michael Flynn, may have just blown a massive hole in the Deep States attempts to railroad an honest man who has served his country well for decades.
On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Emmitt Sullivan demanded to see the FBIs 302s interview summaries of agents ambush interview with Flynn on Jan. 24, 2017, just a few days after POTUS Trump was inaugurated.
According to Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton: Big: Judge Sullivan, who is overseeing General Flynns case, demands to see the infamous FBI 302 and other FBI doc about the ambush Flynn interview set up by Yates, McCabe, and Strzok.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalsentinel.com ...
How about a Constitutional Amendment specifically empowering feds and state gov’t
........to impose capital punishment on govt employees as well as on errant Congressmen?
I, myself, like it......tailor-made for Pay-Per-View.
You mad, bro?
You sound mad.
All I know the worst possible outcome will always happen to team Trump. No benefit of the doubt anytime, no executive privileged, no attorney client privilege, assumed guilty until proven innocent. Team Trump has less Constitutional rights than the illegals in Tijuana, Mexico.
You a dem bro?
You sound disturbed.
Do we need to call for some help for you?
Why would anyone trust 302’s as being reliable? The FBI is biased and corrupt. Why wouldn’t the 302’s be biased and corrupt as well?
“The judge can have them as soon as they can be fetched from the shredder...and taped back together.”
Actually they will compose new docs that exonerates the lot of em.
He should have told the lawyers GO GET THEM NOW AND RETURN BEFORE LUNCH or else be held in contempt and jailed until the NEXT guy brings them
Learn our comms.
Don’t let others DRIVE you.
Well yes, the dems have a plan to Nixon Trump.
We are talking about our sides lack of plan.
What is crazy is the FBI interviewing a suspect without recording it, and then writing down their recollection six months later.
WHY in the world would the FBI NOT use at least a simple tape recorder ?
The FBI does not allow recording interviews. I don’t believe they even take real-time notes. The 302 forms are an invitation to perjury by agents.
WHY? It would seem that just for their own protection they would insist on recording the interviews.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.