Posted on 12/10/2018 9:01:56 AM PST by Olog-hai
Defying fierce opposition from the United States and a few other nations, nearly 85 percent of the countries at the U.N. agreed Monday on a sweeping yet non-binding accord to ensure safe, orderly and humane migration.
The debate over the Global Compact for Migration, the first of its kind, has proven to be a pivotal test of the U.N.-led effort to crack down on the often dangerous and illegal movements across borders that have turned people smuggling into a booming worldwide industry.
“Unregulated migration bears a terrible human cost: a cost in lives lost on perilous journeys across deserts, oceans and rivers; and a cost in lives ruined at the hands of smugglers, unscrupulous employers and other predators,” U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres told a migration conference in Marrakech, Morocco.
“More than 60,000 migrants have died on the move since the year 2000,” he said. “This is a source of collective shame.” …
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
OF COURSE they do. 85% are going to be net EXPORTERS of the impoverished and illiterate.
So 85% of the nations of the world want to dump their problems on the 15%?
We will remain an independent, free and sovereign nation, thank you very much.
So, let those nations take the “refugees!”
And this is important because....?
yes...
Mission of the UN is for third world countries to sack the treasuries of wealthy countries. As the wealthiest country, the U.S. is number one. The UN is also concerned with funding its own inefficient corrupt bureaucracy.
Just demonstrating that a lot of other nations want to play the role in the UN that the USSR vacated.
Two wolves and a sheep vote on whats for dinner.
I wonder how many of the 85% are net exporters, and of the 15% importers?
If you look closely, the backers are the “From” nations, while those opposing are the “To” nations.
Any “To” nation that backs this atrocity is committing suicide.
A glaring example of why you can not believe AP and the other globalist news organizations. So how does it ensure safe migration if it is nonbinding? Well, the immigration lawyers in countries across the world will get to work finding sympathetic judges to MAKE IT BINDING!
Just a few nations: the US, Australia, Israel, Switzerland, Austria, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Italy, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria and I probably left some out.
----------
"So 85% of the nations of the world want to dump their problems on the 15%?"
How very true sir!!
Italy is opposed to this migration crap.
God Bless Salvini.
“Nearly 85 percent of UN nations back migration deal; not US”
And probably 85 percent of UN nations will send their undesirables to other countries.
A sensible deal: Stay home and fix your own country.
This is global democracy (NWO) for all to see.
In case you had any doubts.
I’m sure places like Chad, Cambodia, Albania, and Rwanda were the first in line.
1. Most of UN members are tiny poor countries. Nothing done to address this will cost them anything.
2. The entire UN is about making developed countries transfer wealth to small poor nations.
3. The US and the West pay most of the funds that operate the UN.
So sure, in numbers only 15% of nations oppose this. BECAUSE the 85% will pay nothing toward dealing with the problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.