How Much Blood Would Leftists Be Willing To Shed To Disarm Patriotic Americans?

Townhall.com ^ | December 6, 2018 | Kurt Schlichter

[Kaslin]

My question for Congressjerk Eric Swalwell is pretty simple: “How many Americans would you murder to achieve your goal of disarming us?”

It’s a fair question. 

Swalwell is the MSNBC stalwart who recently wrote an op-ed advocating that the government confiscate the guns that make people like him wet themselves and imprison those of us who decline to surrender them. Millions of Americans own these basic tools of freedom, which the ignorant call “assault weapons,” and these loyal citizens keep and bear them to protect themselves, their families, their communities and their Constitution. But Rep. Swalwell would make these citizens felons, though these patriots are only a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants. 

Of course, he wants to make these patriots felons because they are a threat to criminals and aspiring tyrants. After all, that’s what leftist Democrats like him are.

Now, we know that some Americans would resist this kind of tyranny. People all over the world are resisting the elite’s commands. The Brits Brexited. The French are rioting because they don’t want to sacrifice their livelihoods on behalf of the global elites’ weird weather religion. And a decree that the Second Amendment is not a thing anymore would certainly provoke some serious pushback here.

That’s why it’s fair to ask Rep. Bloodlust how much blood he’s prepared to shed to achieve his goal of disarming Normal Americans. 

Rep. Swalwell, some people are going to fight rather than cave in, so what’s the number of bodies you would be willing to pile up to win? Let’s put aside the right or wrong of resistance; it’ll be a thing. It’ll happen. You’re from near San Francisco, so you don’t know any real Americans, but even though I am from that hellhole too, I’ve met a few Americans in my travels. They are an ornery people who don’t give in to the kind of bullying you advocate. So, you’re going to have to kill some people to do what you want, and I just want to know how many you’re prepared to off to achieve your goal.

After all, it’s not as if you Democrats don’t already have a history of killing people for having guns you disapprove of.

Remember Waco? The raid on David Koresh’s compound was because his weird band of misfits allegedly had scary, outlawed guns. That’s why Democrat Janet Reno initially decided to send in the troops. The government got four of our ATF agents killed, then slaughtered the resisters, including women and kids.

Was it worth it? Maybe these creepy cultists were violating the law, but was making sure they didn’t have guns that were scary worth shooting or burning alive about 80 people, including four cops?

Was it?

So, in light of his party’s track record, I want to know how many people Rep. Swalwell – who fancies himself a potent Democrat presidential contender – is prepared to see die so he can ensure Americans are disarmed in order to please the liberal Californians he represents. How many?

One?

One hundred?

One thousand? 

One hundred thousand?

More?

How many corpses would Eric Swalwell and his blue state buddies accept because they don’t think some law-abiding citizen in Oklahoma should be allowed to choose what kind of weapon he has, because they think they should choose for him, and that that choice should be “None?” 

On Twitter, which is a wonderful thing because it makes people truly reveal themselves, one gentleman pointed out the not-so-far-fetched notion that mass gun confiscation (let’s leave the problematic logistics for the gun-hating fascists aside) would spark a civil war. But Rep. Swalwell was not worried; he observed that a bunch of citizens with rifles could not stand up to a military armed with nuclear weapons.

Well, that’s a troubling notion.

Now, Congressman Strangelove properly took a lot of grief for suggesting nuking fellow Americans, but even if you accept his backtracking about how this was a joke – nothing’s funnier than suggesting the mass murder of fellow Americans! – he only put nukes off limits. What killing systems are still on the table? Infantry? Artillery? Bombers? Because his answer assumed that he would support prosecuting a war against those who failed to obey and submit to arrest.

So, Congressman, what means of destructions are still on the table to use against fellow Americans who refuse to allow you to strip them of their Second Amendment rights because you Bay Area liberals want to show those hicks in Jesusland who’s boss? Is shooting them okay? Shelling them? Bombing them, just not with nukes?

Having seen the fruits of oppression overseas, I find this troubling. Actually, that’s putting it lightly. I find it horrifying. I’ve written about it in my novels about how our country could be ripped apart by leftist oppression. My just-released book Wildfire paints a most unpretty picture, but my predictions keep coming true. Try as I might, nothing I write speculating about what they would do if given the chance seems to hold a candle to what people like Congressman Stalin tell us they are actually willing to do to crush us under their Gucci loafers.

Understand that the leftists with Swalwell’s mentality are not driven by notions of justice or reason, but by cold hatred for Normal Americans. We’ve been disobedient. We’ve been defiant. We’ve refused to surrender our means of defending our own sovereignty to our elite overlords, and that is intolerable.

After all, a man without a rifle is not a citizen. He’s a serf, subject to the whims and will of his overlords who you damn well know are never giving up the guns their minions keep and bear.

Look at England. They gave up their guns. Now, the police watch their Twitter feeds and arrest them if they say unapproved things. That’s not a bug to our liberal elite; that’s a feature. That’s the goal.

Wait, this is crazy talk! If we disarm and only a government controlled by the liberal elite has guns, our overlords will be totally cool. They’ll respect our right to say and do what we want. They’ll allow us to practice our religion as we please. You know, just like liberals respect the rights of normal people where they are in control, like on college campuses, or on social media, or in the municipalities that hassle Christian cake shops.

Get woke. They hate you, and your freedom to tell them to pound sand sticks in their collective collectivist craw. Ignore the leftist media and the Fredocon collaborators who demand you not believe your lying eyes or ears when they tell you what they intend to do to you if given the chance. 

So, the question remains. Our liberal elite betters think we should be stripped of those scary bangsticks the Constitution protects, and we disagree. So, Rep. Swalwell, how many Americans are you willing to kill to fulfill your vision of a disarmed, defenseless, servile population of docile subjects?

One?

One hundred?

One thousand? 

One hundred thousand?

More?

My third novel about America after it splits into two countries, one red and one blue, just dropped. Check out Wildfire and see what could happen if we fail to defend our freedom in the face of people who want to make us Venezuela del Norte.

[snoringbear]

“The Left thinks that they would have law enforcement and the military on their side, but they might be surprised to discover otherwise.”

My thoughts too. What the Left May not know is the rank and file LEO’s and the same with the military personnel, especially in the elite combat units, are conservative. And, because military service tends to be multi-generational (tradition of serving runs in families) it’s problematic that they would take action against their parents, grandparents, uncles, cousins, etc. don’t think it would happen...

[jim35]

Don’t you believe it. The left won’t have to fight, just convince young city boys and girls to do it for them. The South thought the same thing in 1861. Bad people are good at getting good people to do their fighting for them. I believe the military would side with the right, but you never know how things are going to shake out.

[chris37]

The answer is going to be all of their own.

[Dalberg-Acton]

Don’t nuke me, Bro!

[Lurker]

I really like this Schlichter guy.

L

[PGalt]

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956

[sarge83]

The left will not shed a drop of their blood but would eagerly get every federal law enforcement officer and all US military personnel killed to confiscate firearms from American citizens.

If the Fed LEO’s and the military buck on disarming American citizens this crap dies a quick death. My money says for now, the DOJ/FBI clearly hold that laws are for the little people and you will comply with your betters. The fed leo’s would take huge casualties to try and disarm American citizens, and they would.

The wild card is the US military. Would they fire on US citizens. They did on the Bonus Marchers in the 1930’s so there is precedent. If they refuse to go along with confiscation the Fed leo’s quickly get taken out and this ends. If they go along with confiscation then it get real nasty real quick. Lots of death on both sides and something like Northern Ireland for decades.

[SaveFerris]

[just convince young city boys and girls to do it for them]

How much food can they grow in those cities once it starts?

Just asking.

They’ll eventually turn on each other when the food runs out. In about 3-10 days.

[M Kehoe]

Molon labe bump.

5.56mm

[PGalt]

Little man with a totalitarian mouth, that POS Swalwell.

[elcid1970]

“...whose minions have all the technological means of discovering who has the guns and extracting them with minimal fuss.”

That explains all the SWAT raids I’ve been seeing in my neighborhood.\s

Seriously, gun grabbers aren’t omnipotent. Sure, they’re slogging through mountains of paper 4473’s at the BATF record center and trying to create a master database of guns & owners (which is illegal since 1986). But 4473 only records point of retail sale.

My Dad told me, “in order to have a registration law, you must have a deregistration law”. Which is exactly what the gun grabbers want when they propose “universal background checks”. Record every transfer and you have registration. Then confiscation according to how the political winds blow.

But there is no registration law. Private unrecorded sales are legal and if the Senate & PDJT stand firm, those will stay that way.

This isn’t Britain, Australia, Germany or anywhere else in the world. Where are all the gun laws passed when the Dems controlled Congress & Obama had eight years to wield his executive order pen? Yes, states like CA, NY, NJ, MA, and now WA have gone fascist with FOID & registration of scary black rifles, but the noncompliance rate is so huge that the po-po fear going door to door.

I mean, you’re a cop turned out in full tacticool. But you can’t help assuming that behind every front door you’re about to knock on stands an AR-15 owner angry at being told that what was once legal is now illegal and that he is being treated like a felon. He ignores your repeated knocks.

Sure, bring on the battering ram, which will make the owner’s adrenalin skyrocket and at that point all bets are off.

You do like to go home at night, don’t you?

[DarthVader]

They will have no one. They will self terminate.

[G Larry]

You learned the wrong lesson.

There was nobody home manning those weapons, with the knowledge that they were coming for their guns.

[griswold3]

And once the “Progressives” perceive some type of injury, you’d be surprised how fast those who oppose them would become enemy of the state worthy of a ‘final solution’.
(For the common good, of course)

[MeganC]

“The question should be How many leftists will be slain trying to disarm America?”

Hopefully Mr. Swawell is first.

[BOBWADE]

The President should recall government-issued firearms and ammunition which was distributed to non-LEO individuals and combine with some of our Military’s surplus weapons from storage. This would allow an inventory which could be distributed to able-bodied Americans willing to join an officially sanctioned Federal militia. Guarantee the rights of these militiamen to own and maintain assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, military grade ammunition.

[Mr. Mohasky]

How much blood?

As much blood as bloodshed could if bloodshed would shed blood.

Real answer, every-single-one-of-us. Every man, woman, child, dog, you name it, he wants us dead.

[sport]

A lot of the blood of others. Not much, if any, of theirs. As history has shown, they use idiots,the gullible, those wanting to get something for nothing, foolish dreamers, and others that they can seduce by their lies and treachery. After their drones and idiots have done the grunt work, they swoop down and reap the fruit of their labors. It worked for Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Castro.

[neverevergiveup]

“Not likely. They would be more subtle and plan the disarmament to occur over two or three generations. But the right circumstance... some of them are more than self-deluded enough to do it.”

This strategy of incrementalism might have worked, but the left became too self-confident in the inevitability of their path to control, and they showed their hand too soon. They can't put the genie back in the bottle. Their agenda and tactics are now common knowledge, and their ‘element of stealth and surprise’ is gone.

[aomagrat]

The bloodshed has begun. Gary J. Willis was killed by police in Maryland when they came to confiscate his guns under the state’s “Red Flag Law.”

http://concealednation.org/2018/11/gun-owner-killed-during-attempted-gun-confiscation-in-maryland/

This is how they plan on doing confiscation. The question is not what we are going to do when they come for our guns. The question is what are we going to do when they come for our neighbor’s guns.