Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP Fact Check: Obama didn’t have family separation policy
Associated Press ^ | November 27, 2018 | Calvin Woodward

Posted on 11/26/2018 11:10:53 PM PST by Olog-hai

President Donald Trump is falsely asserting that the federal policy that split migrant families at the border was practiced by his predecessor, Barack Obama, as well.

The Obama and Trump administrations operated under the same immigration laws but the “zero tolerance” policy that drove children from their parents was Trump’s. […]

The president is correct, however, in saying that photos of children in holding cells were misrepresented online as showing the effects of Trump’s immigration policy. …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Mexico
KEYWORDS: aliens; fakenews; familyseparation; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Memory hole time at the old OuterParty MiniTrue AP.
1 posted on 11/26/2018 11:10:53 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.” - Abraham Lincoln


2 posted on 11/26/2018 11:25:01 PM PST by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

That’s why kids were in cages separated from their families. Otay AP.


3 posted on 11/26/2018 11:42:36 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

AP lying again.
Shocker.


4 posted on 11/26/2018 11:59:50 PM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
At least Jeh Johnson, Obama's DHS, and the man who enforced Obama's policy was more honest and pragmatic about the situation than the finger pointing, blame gaming AP:

DHS Sec. Jeh Johnson: I Freely Admit We Detained Children, It Was Necessary

5 posted on 11/27/2018 12:10:25 AM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, said the Obama administration attempted to keep “quiet” about how many unaccompanied minors were crossing the border and that children were being held in detention centers.

“There were large numbers of people coming in,” Cuellar said in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

“The Obama administration was trying to keep this quiet.”

According to the Washington Post, nearly 70,000 unaccompanied minors were apprehended at the border in 2014.

CNN 6/16/18


6 posted on 11/27/2018 12:16:10 AM PST by NoLibZone (If Putin flies to Mexico, crosses the border illegally, he can vote in San Francisco.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
You gotta keep em separated
7 posted on 11/27/2018 12:30:26 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"to Check" has multiple meanings, for example: to "check the amount of inventory on hand" (verify) or in some cases to "CHECK a swing" or "Check a GOAL" (block or thwart)

Liberal "fact" Checking is all about blocking, thwarting and obfuscating FACTS

8 posted on 11/27/2018 12:39:11 AM PST by KTM rider ( .......than to post and remove all doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Because his policies rewarded children for arriving without their parents.


9 posted on 11/27/2018 1:11:22 AM PST by gundog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So the AP provably comes out as a propaganda source and not as an objective journalist source.

That’s enough to deny them press credentials I think.


10 posted on 11/27/2018 1:26:30 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

‘Check’ also has the meaning of a promissory note as in: how big was that Soros check?


11 posted on 11/27/2018 1:58:59 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Nice one.


12 posted on 11/27/2018 2:45:57 AM PST by momincombatboots (How many vetoed spending dollars with chuck n Nancy without wall funding?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The AP lies.


13 posted on 11/27/2018 3:54:00 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Can we exchange the kids in cages for fake journalists in cages?


14 posted on 11/27/2018 4:04:48 AM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

One of my favorites.


15 posted on 11/27/2018 4:05:16 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic is one stop shopping...It's the super Walmart for news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So-called “Fact Checking” has devolved into yet another form of MSM propaganda. And typical of the “liberal” mindset, they somehow think they alone can pass judgement on others without question. F’em.


16 posted on 11/27/2018 4:08:28 AM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They seem to be implying that the previous administration didn’t enforce the law.


17 posted on 11/27/2018 5:55:50 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Who the hell is “fact checking” the Ass. Press? They don’t have the credibility to do it themselves.


18 posted on 11/27/2018 6:01:11 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Fact checking” is just the commie ‘RATS’ way of saying we believe our own propaganda.


19 posted on 11/27/2018 6:02:55 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywise
So the AP provably comes out as a propaganda source and not as an objective journalist source.
There are no objective journalist sources. The purpose of the First Amendment is to protect the right of the people to listen to, and read the opinions of, whoever they wanna. Far from assuring objectivity, restricting the government’s ability to regulate printers - which is what the First Amendment does - guarantees that government cannot “assure objectivity.”
That’s enough to deny them press credentials I think.
Since no journalistic enterprise can, under 1A, be licensed by the government, granting “press credentials” to anyone is nothing the Constitution has anything to do with. All this poppycock about a rude person associated with CNN having a “right” to equality among journalists with press passes is simply a political fight between the illegal journalism cartel (of which the AP is IMHO the linchpin) and a politician (Donald Trump) whose political party is opposed by the cartel.

Everyone has a right to be a journalist. You have that right, and so do I. In fact, we’re exercising Jim Robinson’s right to be a printer just like any paid reporter might exercise the right of his employer (printer). It doesn’t matter whether or not Jim Robinson’s web site uses ink and paper or not because the authors of the Constitution specifically mentioned the right of Congress to establish the patent office “to promote the progress of science and useful arts.” So, there has been progress in the useful art of propagating opinion, which does not require ink and paper. The principle of the First Amendment that I am allowed to read the writing of anyone who wants to allow me to do so does not change. Unless of course the states amend the Constitution . . .


20 posted on 11/27/2018 8:10:04 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson