Skip to comments.
RUSH LIMBAUGH WON'T RULE OUT RUN FOR PRESIDENT
World Net Daily ^
| 26 NOV 2018
| JOE KOVACS
Posted on 11/22/2018 5:34:48 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: reasonisfaith
41
posted on
11/22/2018 6:13:51 PM PST
by
max americana
(Fired libtard employees 9 consecutive times at every election since 08'. I hope all liberals die.)
To: reasonisfaith
42
posted on
11/22/2018 6:17:53 PM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
RUSH LIMBAUGH WON'T RULE OUT RUN FOR PRESIDENT. Great...he’ll simply talk his opposition to death. 😂😂
To: reasonisfaith
Rush has always had a big ego. I find that insufferable. While I appreciate Rush’s many contributions to the conservative cause, for that reason I cannot listen to him.
44
posted on
11/22/2018 6:19:06 PM PST
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: reasonisfaith
Which trillionaires, specifically?
45
posted on
11/22/2018 6:19:37 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Rush,as outstanding a talk host as he is,isn't even close to being qualified.DJT was,IMO,qualified for one reason (and only one reason) and that is the fact that there are two giant glass-and-steel skyscrapers in Manhattan that has his name above the front entrance.Meaning,of course,amazing success in the business world.
P>I'd strongly support Rush being named the President's Press Secretary...but President? Nope!
46
posted on
11/22/2018 6:19:52 PM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(I've Never Owned Slaves...You've Never Picked Cotton.End Of "Discussion".)
To: reasonisfaith
This proves Rush is deep state.
_________________________
No, this post proves freepers lose more credibility than other inanities spewed. Some of you are beyond pitiful.
To: RooRoobird20
He’s not going to run against Trump. He’s only the possibility when DJT has served his two terms.
48
posted on
11/22/2018 6:22:59 PM PST
by
gspurlock
(http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It is about time. Stop talking and start walking the walk. Do something about this mess. People WILL follow you.
49
posted on
11/22/2018 6:26:32 PM PST
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: max americana
It’s still a trial balloon for 2020.
50
posted on
11/22/2018 6:26:45 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history? The)
To: libh8er
Rush will be too old, he’s not got the energy POTUS has.
Pence is a squish.
Pompeo is the MAN. 2024.
51
posted on
11/22/2018 6:28:59 PM PST
by
Kalamata
(How to interpret The Revelation: http://bibleresearchtools.com/bible-study-video-series/)
To: reasonisfaith
Ever think Trump may say the hell with it and walk away? Maybe Trump told him he might not seek reelection...They do speak often...
To: Kalamata
Trump like myself may have found out the United States is to far gone to save and may not want to put up with the massive BS he is dealing with.
To: libh8er
After 16 years as VP he will be the most experienced VP ever. You say that as if it were a good thing. VP is not an assistant president, he is the political heir of the POTUS. It doesn’t increase your electability for POTUS much if at all. Only three sitting presidents - Washington, Jackson, and Reagan - have seen their VPOTUS elected POTUS. And the Washington example doesn’t really count, since Adams was not his running mate in the pre-12th Amendment era. And, in a sense, you have to throw in FDR - since he won a third term in his own right rather than seeing his VP win it.
To: dpetty121263; Eagles Field; clintonh8r; HANG THE EXPENSE; alstewartfan
Rush made his fortune in the antemaga era, in total submission to the deep state. The only reasonable expectation is that he would oppose MAGA.
55
posted on
11/22/2018 6:39:25 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history? The)
To: reasonisfaith
Who are the trillionaires who control him, though?
56
posted on
11/22/2018 6:45:37 PM PST
by
clintonh8r
(Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
To: All
The only way Rush was able to get national syndication was the demand for MAGA that started a decade or two before his show.
Rush turned this demand into his own personal gold mine. Listening to Rush felt, to his audience, like an outlet for this demand. Meanwhile, Rush advanced the ball zero yards in thirty years.
57
posted on
11/22/2018 6:48:58 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history? The)
To: clintonh8r
Maybe they’re billionaires.
58
posted on
11/22/2018 6:50:20 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history? The)
To: reasonisfaith
LOFL.
You are entertaining.
Well, a little, anyways.
59
posted on
11/22/2018 6:53:04 PM PST
by
going hot
(happiness is a momma deuce)
To: going hot
There is no substance in your comment.
60
posted on
11/22/2018 6:53:52 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history? The)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-150 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson