Posted on 11/20/2018 8:31:44 PM PST by Az Joe
Show us one scintilla of evidence that Horowitz interviewed JDG/VT’s client.
Just one!
Demanding someone to prove a negative is so...leftist.
To demonize JDG/VT by equating them to Deep Staters as listed is quite Alinskyesque.
Sorry bagman, but you’re so blinded that you can’t see factual reality and continue defending the indefensible.
Bagman, you demonstrate a complete lack of Common Sense - are you off your meds? Come back to reality.
“Huber is much higher on the food chain.”
But, after sniffing him out, Obama found him highly acceptable. Why would that be if he is straight?
“No wonder you anti-Sessions jackals were so rabid. Your disease was based on ignorance.”
“anti-Session”??? We are all right there with Trump and common sense.
“jackals”???
“Your disease”!!!!
You sound like someone who has become unhinged. I did wonder about the Q true believers once he played out.
“Did Huber interview certain subjects? No he did not. Did he have to? No he did not.”
Interviewing witnesses is extremely basic to an investigation.
I heard DiGenova say yesterday that NO ONE had yet interviewed his prime FBI witness to the Uranium One scam. Remember, the one who has all the goods on Hillary and Mueller?
I have as much as you have, none, other than the word, or should I say "insinuation" that he did. That and common sense. .
The thing is, though, you seem to be putting all your eggs in the U-1 basket. There are TONS of other investigative avenues regarding Hillary.
Did your guy say Huber never interviewed his client? Sure he did. Would he be in a position to know? Of course.
What did he say about Horowitz or the FBI? Do you know?
I still haven't seen it. So, I'll go with my guy for now, until proven otherwise.
Thanks.
You know, you could say the same thing in the opposite direction.
"After sniffing him out, Trump found him highly acceptable. Why would he do that if he's crooked'?
See how that works?
“See how that works?”
No. Your point does not make sense. Trump has certainly made mistakes in appointing people, but he is new to the political world and he has to rely on advisors.
But the Left NEVER makes mistakes in choosing their lackeys, as far as I can remember.
Are you gonna try and tell me you "anti Sessions" people didn't behave like a pack of slavering jackals? I read the threads.
And your common sense doesn't appear to be mine. So how common is it?
“Your disease”!!!!
Absolutely. The "anti Sessions" feeding frenzy made you guys look like a pack of wild, mad dogs foaming from the mouth. Nothing personal, just an observation.
You sound like someone who has become unhinged. I did wonder about the Q true believers once he played out.
Not so. It's those who claim to support Trump yet attack his every move, cry, stomp their feet demanding this or that on their own personal timetable, act like they know what's going on when they don't have a clue, and rabidly attack anyone with another opinion or way of thinking that sound unhinged.
Oh yea, and refuse to accept undeniable truths when they are presented to them. The failure to use common logic is another sign of appearing "unhinged".
So no, goodman, I am not the unhinged one around here.
And that thing you mentioned (which JR has kindly asked us not to talk about)? That's not "played out". Not by a long shot.
But you know that.
No, really?
I heard DiGenova say yesterday that NO ONE had yet interviewed his prime FBI witness to the Uranium One scam.
Well, if you HEARD it, it must be true.
I've not heard that until just this second, from you.
Remember, the one who has all the goods on Hillary and Mueller?
ALL the goods? Really?
But, let's say you and your sources are correct, and NOBODY interviewed those witnesses. Not the FBI, not Horowitz, and not Huber.
I'll let you have that (hypothetically).
Does that mean that Huber will have nothing to say on December 5 when he goes in front of Congress to testify?
About ANYTHING?
Your link doesn’t even work (no surprise). Looks like it would have been to an article about a year old, from a well known leftist to begin with. Final grade: F.
I’ll go with credible patriots JDG/VT whose record speaks for itself.
You can stay with the Deep Staters with no record of being a patriot...but just the opposite.
Common Sense.
Your choice, Saul.
Buh-Bye.
Huber’s mandate from Sessionx was to obfuscate and bury the whole thing.
That's a mighty bold statement.
Food for thought. We can both probably agree that Obama (and Clinton) purged patriots from the upper echelons of the military and put in place suck-boy, desk jockey, leg humpers, for the most part. At least when he could identify them as patriots.
And yet, one of the main anti-derp warriors helping the Donald is Admiral Mike Rogers.
Obama left him in place. Mistake?
General Mike Flynn also rode out the storm of the Obama administration. Was he deep state too? Another mistake by the Obama people?
It's not a good idea to underestimate the enemy. But neither is overestimating them.
As somebody I know often says, "These people are stupid".
Gateway Pundit tells bald-faced lie in first sentence. ‘Special Prosecutor’ is pure fantasy.
“Are you gonna try and tell me you “anti Sessions” people didn’t behave like a pack of slavering jackals? I read the threads.”
I also read some threads, and what is said here doesn’t much go beyond what Trump has said from day one after the elf recused his cowardly self.
“And your common sense doesn’t appear to be mine. So how common is it?”
The term “common sense” is comprehended by everyone.
“The “anti Sessions” feeding frenzy made you guys look like a pack of wild, mad dogs foaming from the mouth.”
Again, I have not read all the threads, but what I have noticed never goes beyond what Trump himself says. Rush was talking yesterday about the Russian collusion investigation being the most successful hoax in history, all thanks to Sessions.
“It’s those who claim to support Trump yet attack his every move...”
I have not seen that on this site. Most of us ardently support his move of getting rid to Sessions.
“Oh yea, and refuse to accept undeniable truths when they are presented to them.”
You, certainly, have not presented any undeniable truths.
“And that thing you mentioned (which JR has kindly asked us not to talk about)? That’s not “played out”. Not by a long shot.”
I don’t have a clue what you are referring to.
*Effect.
p
Ooops. My bad. Why no surprise?. I'll post it again.
Looks like it would have been to an article about a year old, from a well known leftist to begin with. Final grade: F.
The age of the article is irrelevant, right? It was timely when written. And why is he a "well-known" leftist? Because you say? You're the expert now all of a sudden on whose right and whose left?
I have reason to question your credibility on that score, goodman.
And how bout you address the message and not the messenger. Try that for a change.
Turley: Sessions’ Appointing Utah Federal Prosecutor Much Better for Trump than 2nd Special Counsel
(excerpt)
Professor Jonathan Turley, a top national legal expert on government investigations, commented on Thursday about Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ decision to bring in U.S. Attorney John Huber.
Turley called it “brilliant”to combine all the powers of the U.S. Department of Justice’s inspector general with a prosecutor who can bring charges, seek indictments, and get results for President Trump far more quickly than a second special counsel.
Anyway. Give it a read and see if you don't change your mind, if you are capable of that. It's pretty compelling and logical. Do you do logical?
Sorry about the bad link.
p.s. This link works.
Don’t have a Thanksgiving picnic at a park.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.