“Did Huber interview certain subjects? No he did not. Did he have to? No he did not.”
Interviewing witnesses is extremely basic to an investigation.
I heard DiGenova say yesterday that NO ONE had yet interviewed his prime FBI witness to the Uranium One scam. Remember, the one who has all the goods on Hillary and Mueller?
No, really?
I heard DiGenova say yesterday that NO ONE had yet interviewed his prime FBI witness to the Uranium One scam.
Well, if you HEARD it, it must be true.
I've not heard that until just this second, from you.
Remember, the one who has all the goods on Hillary and Mueller?
ALL the goods? Really?
But, let's say you and your sources are correct, and NOBODY interviewed those witnesses. Not the FBI, not Horowitz, and not Huber.
I'll let you have that (hypothetically).
Does that mean that Huber will have nothing to say on December 5 when he goes in front of Congress to testify?
About ANYTHING?