Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Obviously there is no "right" for anyone to be let into the White House.
1 posted on 11/14/2018 10:14:50 AM PST by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Innovative; Lazamataz

In the Obama White House, all questions to President Obama from the White Hut Press Corps had to be pre-approved before they could be asked.

No impromptu questions to President Obama were even allowed.

President Trump does npt require this of the press. Instead he expects respectful , professional civil discourse and respect, instead of controlling all the questions like Obama did.

Which would you expect in a Free Country that emanates the fruits of liberty, the Obama control or Trump freedom and responsibility?

CNN is going to lose this case. Bigly.


58 posted on 11/14/2018 6:26:14 PM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

It isn’t a case of frivolous. It _is_ a case of:

_no_ jurisdiction; what so ever. A court that makes a ruling wherein they haven’t got legal authority, is breaking the law. Judges decide cases based on law. If there is no legislated law covering the case, then there is no case, no remedy, no jurisdiction.

Law is created by the legislative branch, only.

Law is not created by judicial precedence.

Jail for judges who decide a case without any law.


62 posted on 11/15/2018 5:49:29 AM PST by veracious (UN=OIC=Islam ; Dems may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson