From Victoria's Secret to Hillary's Big Secret.
Posted on 11/13/2018 1:48:33 PM PST by OddLane
The Victoria’s Secret brand hopes to showcase a ‘transgender’ biological man in women’s underwear, says Ed Razek, the brand’s chief marketing officer. Razek’s statement came after progressives and transgender activists rallied on social media to complain he was excluding men who live as women from the brand’s glitzy idealization of women’s sexual power.
Razek sparked the dispute when he told Vogue that the company uses different fashion shows and different brands to target different groups of women...
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Is that a banana in your panties or are you just...........well, you know the rest.
“target different groups of women...”
so VS targets ugly freaks too?
Bruce Gender will be looking for a job.
Needs to rebuild his? house.
How bout the dressing room? After all, fair is fair, right?
I don’t want to get banned, nor get too graphic. But women’s underwear fits differently than men’s. Biological males in women’s underwear, would be, how to say this, wearing garments which aren’t designed to accommodate a man.
Uh..............ya gotta T & A problem there, bunkey.
Cool. I have been thinking about doing a little crossdressing on the weekends and now I know where to go to get some sexy stuff........said no real man ever.
Bruce Jenner is available and eager for the opportunity!!
From Victoria's Secret to Hillary's Big Secret.
given just how skimpy and see-through much Victoria’s merchandise is
this sicko company man had better make SURE his model has had his dickectomy
Ewwww
Johnny Depp reprising his role as Ed Wood?
Lace and chiffon jock strap?
Wondering why I keep seeing the same article posted over and over and over. Not just this one over the past several days but my gosh so many. What’s going on that people don’t search first. FR should update programming to catch duplicates. I know, impossible in the Stone Age of programming.
Why an I reminded of The United Colors of Benetton? They extol the joys of Paedophilia, another twisted and unnatural form of sexual attractiveness.
Apparently a pretty good marketing strategy for a certain niche of potential customers. But not for the general public.
That won’t work. Even if “he” is mutilated to the point that there’s nothing down there, the male hip structure is all wrong for women’s underwear.
Basically, men and women’s waist to hip structure is wide on top, skinny on bottom for men (which is why gut fat ends up being more problematic for men). Women are skinny on top, wide on bottom.
Plus, there’s also that obvious forehead bump on men versus smooth for women.
“Transgendered women” in Victoria’s Secret stuff? If you have seen one, you have seen one too many.
Convergence extends to the lingerie industry. About time.
The whole thing needs to go down in flames.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.