Posted on 11/08/2018 7:19:06 PM PST by bitt
Gotta check my pocket Constitution, but I'm pretty sure the House has jurisdiction over creating new judicial districts.
But yes, there's no question that the Ninth needs to be broken up.
Like most other 9th circuit decisions this will be overturned, especially now with Ginsburg out.
I don’t know how many of you have elderly parents but they don’t recover from bone breaks well. Rib fractures usually cause pnemonia as well. It did with Rand Paul and he ain’t elderly. I lost both my MiL and my father to pnemonia.
I would as president use that statement and actually continue to do what I wanted. If the ruling actually states that an action is “likely unlawful” then the court has not fully stated that the action is in fact “unlawful”. A court needs to say whether an action “IS” or “IS NOT” lawful. If it uses weasel words such as “likely”, then any pol can drive an executive order mack truck and do any thing he wants.
Now this a MSM report watering down the ruling for sound bite addicted folks, but if the actual court ruling said “likely” then they have not ruled at all.
Apologies... I was thinking about judicial appointments only.
It’s the 9th.
The communists on the 9th are overturned by the Supremes more often than not
“Likely unlawful”???????Still lots of work for McConnell to help Trump do with the courts.....
I don’t think Ginsburg is out. Do you have a citation?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.