Skip to comments.
US appeals court rules against Trump over DACA cancellation
The Hill ^
| 11/8/2018
| Avery Anapol
Posted on 11/08/2018 7:19:06 PM PST by bitt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
11/08/2018 7:19:06 PM PST
by
bitt
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...
2
posted on
11/08/2018 7:19:27 PM PST
by
bitt
("Let justice be done though the heavens fall".)
To: bitt
To: bitt
A U.S. appeals court has ruled that President Trump’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program is likely unlawful. What a joke - how in any twisted amount of logic is the President of the United States rescinding an Executive Order "unlawful"? There isn't a LAW at all!
To: bitt
A sitting president can rescind a former president¨s order. What´s so hard about that. Oh yeah some snowflakes wittle feelings are going to get hurt. So give them some crayons.
6
posted on
11/08/2018 7:23:52 PM PST
by
seawolf101
(Member LES DEPLORABLES)
To: bitt
I haven’t even read the article yet, and I’m sure it’s the 9th circuit.
To: JohnBrowdie
To: bitt
9
posted on
11/08/2018 7:41:10 PM PST
by
tcrlaf
(They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
To: bitt
DACA was illegal and unconstitutional.
These F’in clowns need to be held in rebellion against the Constitution.
10
posted on
11/08/2018 7:49:31 PM PST
by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: bitt
The President has it within his statutory and constitutional authority to suspend all grants of asylum, should he choose to do so. This was reaffirmed by the SCOTUS in June of this year, in the case,
Trump v. Hawaii, No. 17-965 in the Supreme Court of the United States. “8USC 1182(f) and 1185(a) By its terms, §1182(f) exudes deference to the President in every clause. It entrusts to the President the decisions whether and when to suspend entry, whose entry to suspend, for how long, and on what conditions. It thus vests the President with “ample power” to impose entry restrictions in addition to those elsewhere enumerated in the INA.”
11
posted on
11/08/2018 8:15:31 PM PST
by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left tpoo long, they become black rifles.)
To: bitt
If it was created by EO, it can be rescinded by EO.
To: Robert DeLong
If it was created by EO, it can be rescinded by EO. Barky's EO supersede the constitution.
Trump's EO are unconstitutional because racism.
13
posted on
11/08/2018 8:31:09 PM PST
by
oldbrowser
(The government did not create the people. The people created the government.)
To: bitt
Send EVERY illegal back their home counties. No ‘court’ can stop us on that...
14
posted on
11/08/2018 9:14:20 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(Watch this for our survival: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE)
To: Robert DeLong
Well, the appeals court says otherwise and is effectively rewriting the law.
If SCOTUS doesn’t correct this, we’re seriously #’d.
15
posted on
11/08/2018 9:20:17 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Windflier
Thanks for that info, Windy.
A disturbing ruling by the appeals court.
16
posted on
11/08/2018 9:23:42 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Gene Eric
the 9th is always going to vote against Trump. Perhaps he needs to state he wants the opposite. 8>)
I know, then they would agree with him. In case you haven't noticed we are#'d as you say.
To: Gene Eric
A disturbing ruling by the appeals court. It's only disturbing in the sense that the Ninth Circuit is defying the Supreme Court's ruling in Hawaii vs Trump.
I only posted a snippet of the full ruling. The high court ruled that the President's powers over matters of immigration are nearly absolute, as stated in statute law and the Constitution.
The judges on the Ninth Circuit are completely aware of this, but have chosen to buck the high court anyway. There's no question that their ruling will be thrown out with prejudice, but Congress truly needs to intervene here. Impeachments are in order, and perhaps, even splitting the court into two or three smaller jurisdictions.
It's out of control.
18
posted on
11/08/2018 10:30:12 PM PST
by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left tpoo long, they become black rifles.)
To: Windflier
>> the Ninth Circuit is defying the Supreme Court’s ruling
A culture of capricious defiance.
Yes, the court requires a correction. Hopefully, we’ll have a solid on the Senate, and make that happen.
19
posted on
11/08/2018 10:50:23 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: bitt
20
posted on
11/08/2018 11:00:29 PM PST
by
TBP
(Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson