The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Monday that U.S. military personnel will not interact with immigrants approaching the U.S. border
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Try saying it right this time;
ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
Barbed wire fencing.
The Hungarian approach.
Plans are thrown out the door when it hits the fan.
Well, that’s disappointing.
I thought we had an Army to protect the country.
General Joseph Dunford calling these invaders “immigrants” tells me everything I need to know about him.
Dunford needs to go.
What the hell is the point of spending all this money on the military if they’re not going to even come into contact with this threat to America’s southern border?
This doesn’t sound good. But keep in mind that he said this “according to ABC News.” It’s possible that his words were twisted or lied about.
Correct.
This will...
.
“There is no plan for U.S. military forces to be involved in the actual mission of denying people entry to the United States,” Gen. Joseph Dunford said, according to ABC News.
“There is no plan for the soldiers to come in with immigrants or to reinforce the Department of Homeland Security as they are conducting their mission,” he continued. “We are providing enabling capability.”
________________________________________________________
How are you going to provide “enabling capability” in any meaningful fashion of you cannot come into contact with illegal immigants (or merely ‘immigrants’ as the General calls them)?
WHAT THE f*** IS enabling capability?
Speak English dammit. This idiot sounds like an obama boy..
No, but their 5.56mm projectiles will.
The 1st caravan is breaking up and has been denied buses.
There was never going to be military vs illegal caravan.(non-military foreigners)
The president looks a little nicer now.
White female suburbanite independent women(and some men/cucks) will breathe a sigh of relief.
Election is tomorrow.
Hopefully it goes well.
If they’re not there to keep invading people from crossing into US territory, using whatever means required to do so, then why are they there? Why is all this taxpayer money being wasted on a lack of show of force and what do they hope to achieve when the illegals start rushing the gates? If they don’t repel them, then we might as well leave ourselves as that would be a signal to allow the damn to burst and the illegals to cross without fear of retaliation. Game over.
Our army is trained to take an area using force if required. They are not trained in diplomacy and are not people persons. They are taught to show they can harm, and to do so when and if required. If they are not going to do anything, then send down bus drivers to move them in. At least we can get them past the southern part of the state so they won’t steal or harm anyone there.
rwood
What is the g*d-damned US Army *FOR*...?
I WANT MY GD MONEY BACK.
Guarding the borders is a legitimate function of an army.
People crossing the border without permission are not immigrants. Stopping them is a legitimate military mission. Invading countries on the other side of the world is an occasional necessity, but guarding America is a constant need.
Posse Comitatus? Applies to citizens. Does not apply to people trying to cross the frontier without permission.
Cucks like Europe.
I guess the Russians and Chinese know how to invade us now. No weapons needed.
If flame throwers are deployed, there would be no need for physical contact...
The troops do not have to come into contact with the criminal aliens. They have laid down barbed wire beneath the bridges over the Rio Grande. They will put Jersey barriers across those bridges. They will then aim the beam from an Active Denial System at the invading force while they are still in Mexico.