Posted on 10/30/2018 5:24:47 PM PDT by detective
Sorry, my iPhone won’t let me scroll further to the left than the vertical axis, so I cannot locate Ryan.
There’s the money shot right there. SCOTUS really has no out on this one. 5-4 or 6-3 and the media will scream partisan SC and of course the “asterisk” justice’s vote doesn’t count. democrats will go absolutes stark raving bonkers - deporting, arresting, turning back all of their future voters but especially stopping the self generating future voters for democrats which are not subject to the jurisdiction of the states in which they are currently living out their lives as fugitives from justice
Exactly why Ryan is leaving. He does not have a clue what is happening
Yeah, we all saw how aggressively you fought to preserve the Constitution, Paul. /sarcasm
Trump wants this to go to the now conservative 5-4 Supreme Court so the constitutional controversy as to birthright citizenship of children born to illegals can be clarified hopefully on the side that the constitution never intended for children of illegals to have birthright citizenship. Clearly if it were a 5-4 liberal court he would not waste his time as the constitution is a mere afterthought to a liberal judiciary in legislative lockstep in enacting progressive policies.Only way of getting it to the Supreme Court is Congress passing a bill ending birthright for illegals. But this would fail passage because Senate Dems would filibuster it. So an executive order should do the trick in getting it in front of the Supreme Court to get the clarification on the issue hopefully ending birthright citizenship for illegals
That’s ok. Lindsay is introducing legislation. Maybe a vote will happen in time for this lame duck to vote
Ryan is not correct
Besides Lindsay has introduced a bill
John Roberts will duck the fundamental question by throwing it to Congress.
Though not what we want, it will assure Trump’s reelection.
Trump will succeed in his second term in forcing Congress to repeal chain migration, a major incentive for young, strong illegals to be the pathfinder in the family.
Yup.
The point is Trump doesn’t need to the courts or congress to enforce the law. Or to NOT enforce an imaginary law(birthright citizenship to illegals)
Next
Ryan may be both right and wrong on this issue. By President Trump making it an executive order, he provokes a challenge that may strike down his policy. However, such a ruling by a lower court will push it up to the Supreme Court who will uphold Trump’s executive order. Oh! will the Left cry rivers of tears and heads will explode like popcorn. Did I say popcorn!!
Seems to me it’s undefined.
No, it is very well defined in the 14th Amendment. The mainstream news always omits the clause defining "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". This clause is well defined and applies to ambassadors and foreign agents, that they are subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign entity and not the USA, so if their baby is born here it does not automatically confer citizenship to the baby of foreign agents. It is very well defined, with supporting verbiage. Illegal aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of other countries, and not of our country. That is why they can be deported. The babies of foreign agents can be deported along with their parents, if need be.
All President Trump needs to do is the mirror the original text of the 14th Amendment and order it followed as written. It will go to the Supreme Court, and if you negate the E.O. then the 14th Amendment must also be negated, or altered. The process to negate or alter would need to be ratified by the states. President Trump is on solid legal ground.
So true. But that train left the station long ago, and the SCOTUS is the only way to go until the legislative swamp is drained.
Bookmark
Watch him, Ryan.
If I’ve been good, an get my wife to make me a sammich. ;-)
I generally pack my own lunch and don’t like to share it nor do I expect to get a lunch hand out.
Roberts is likely to provide much entertainment in the next two years. (He has certainly dropped his profile over the last two years...)
If I’ve been good, I can get my wife to make me a sammich on occassion. ;-)
I generally pack my own lunch and don’t like to share it nor do I expect to get a lunch hand out.
Roberts is likely to provide much entertainment in the next two years. (He has certainly dropped his profile over the last two years...)
Good discussion on this topic, Laura Ingraham has experts on Constitutional Law.
They say that the original intention of the Constitution supports Trump.
I’m not sure gorsuch or kavanuagh would come up with the correct decision. >>>. True no deep state judge is going to rule in favor of the constitution.
Other than McLame I’ve never so anticipated the departure of a Republican as much Ryan’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.