Read carefully as I did not use the word ‘you’ . It was a general observation not an accusation. Therefore no ad hominem occurred. Sorry for the mix up.
Sure it did. Here's the relevant excerpt from your reply:
...to discount the POSSIBILITY of the invaders using it as well, is foolish and naive.
You obviously qualified me as being "foolish and naive", given the fact that I had just "discounted the possibility" in my prior post.
You're now adding insult to injury by assuming I'm too ignorant to notice what you did there.
Now, do you want to start over and rebut the reasoning in my prior post, or will you forfeit the argument by continuing this playground fight?