Not any more:
The President has it within his statutory and constitutional authority to suspend all grants of asylum, should he choose to do so. This was reaffirmed by the SCOTUS in June of this year, in the case, Trump v. Hawaii, No. 17-965 in the Supreme Court of the United States.
8USC 1182(f) and 1185(a) By its terms, §1182(f) exudes deference to the President in every clause. It entrusts to the President the decisions whether and when to suspend entry, whose entry to suspend, for how long, and on what conditions. It thus vests the President with ample power to impose entry restrictions in addition to those elsewhere enumerated in the INA.
If the Demon lawyers and judiciary can find a loophole they will.
Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that should be that. Almost any sentient being said those rulings were ridiculous and clearly unconstitutional but it made no difference to the Resistance.
People who are fleeing poor economic conditions and a lack of stable work are economic migrants not refugees. The leftist media left overall use ‘refugee’ instead of other words, such as ‘migrants’, ‘Aliens’ or ‘Invaders’ because it is a more positive connotation. ...Positive connotations = positive responses/emotions.....and they will always play the emotion card with the public.