CNN Morning Crew Cries 'Sham Investigation', 'Bad for FBI'

NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

[governsleastgovernsbest]

CNN's New Day crew is doing its best to undermine the FBI's latest investigation of Brett Kavanaugh, thus giving cover to wobbly senators considering a 'no' vote.

On CNN this morning, host John Berman suggested that it was a "sham investigation." A bit later, Alisyn Camerota shed crocodile tears, fretting that the supposedly inadequate investigation could be "bad for the FBI."

Get the rest of the story and view the video here.

[snarkytart]

these bitches never know when to stop.

SHAMEFUL what they did to this man and still just keep going like a psycho energizer bunnies.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

Someone needs to find the clip(s) of how they defended the FBI investigators when it was Comey ?

[kanawa]

+1

[ManHunter]

...and their hero Keith Ellison.

[kanawa]

Part of the ‘By Any Means Necessary’ bunch.

[kanawa]

CNN is a sham ‘news network’.

[governsleastgovernsbest]

Thanks, RainMan!

[governsleastgovernsbest]

PS: I’m an excellent driver. ;-)

[pepsionice]

I think CNN doesn’t realize that just by having somewhat pro-Trump supporters watching their ‘junk’....they get people hyped to show up and vote. If they were smart, they’d cease all political news and just go back to regular normal news.

[Lazamataz]

Gosh! I am SHOCKED!!!

[Bob434]

are they talking about the investigation INTO ELLISON? MAYBE THEY ARE CONFUSED? Maybe my cps lock key got clicked by accident?

[Zeppo]

On CNN this morning, host John Berman suggested that it was a "sham investigation."

If he suggested that, no doubt he based that suggestion on facts and trustworthy evidence, rather than just pulling it out of his, um, hat.

Oops, my bad - this is CNN we're talking about.

Of course he just pulled it out of his hat...

[rx]

The left is so fond of its fact-checkers. They often--as I'm sure it's in their handbook--call out their friends to subject their thinking to the (left's planted,) authorized truth outlets.

As such, these fact-checkers, e.g., snopes, politifact, factcheck, etc. are armed with all the Left's talking points. They often overwhelm the reader with information, but usually do so based on faulty reasoning. We're supposed to be so daunted by our well-spoken betters from academia that we simply give in. BS.

In the picture above, the claimed opinion of a claimed Kavanaugh-at-Yale roommate whom none of us know is supposed to supplant our thinking so we could possibly agree that it would be wrong to have a person who lies on SCOTUS. Never mind that six previous FBI investigations never uncovered any significant drinking issue. No, this one fact-checker should sway it for us.

Sorry, leftist, Fake News TV hosts! At this point, your only point can be DELAY, DELAY, DELAY (until after the election). Your point-man, Schumer, has already identified that the Left was going to fight this nomination "AT ALL COSTS." We see that the Left has gone at this nomination sparing neither millions of dollars, their leaders' and followers' reputations, nor the Constitution, e.g., with its presumption of innocence.

We reject this Leftist scorched-Earth practice. Stand down, #WALKAWAY, and DO NOT TAKE A TURN FOR THE VIOLENT. Such a course will not end well for you or that "Fundamentally Transforming guy, Barry Soetero."

[TigerClaws]

Wasn’t criticizing the FBI unamerican?

“They put their lives on the line for all of us! How dare you?!”

Oh, right. That’s only when they’re investigating Trump.

[cranked]

People still watching these clusterphucks of Idiots? Like wtf?!