It doesn’t matter what the doctor-patient privilege is in recording impressions relating to an experience not commonly shared. The patient-doctoe conversation is still just hearsay, the doctor’s notes/tapes being just a non-legally-binding exchange, the product of a fertile mind. The notes should not be used in court, although information from them might be used to extraneously establish an admissible cause-effect statement of fact going back to original parties to an event.
if the dr confirms she was told 4 attackers not 2 then there is a contradiction to chrissies statement of 2 attackers..
that is its value as they say this is not a criminal trial
heresay
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/hearsay-evidence.html