if the dr confirms she was told 4 attackers not 2 then there is a contradiction to chrissies statement of 2 attackers..
that is its value as they say this is not a criminal trial
heresay
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/hearsay-evidence.html
The doctpr can only reort a conversation not taking place before the examiners. It is the doctor’s word against Fords. Still hearsay, even though by the professional. Means less than what Ford says. I’m no longer interested in this line of evaluating the particular point.