And in total agreement about the already slipped up stuff too. The testimony shown she lied under oath. The flying part alone. And the part of hearing them talking downstairs. And in the same testimony said she didn’t hear them downstairs, just thought they was probably talking downstairs. There was a few other parts too. If I remember correctly, on the body language breakdown of her testimony, is shows the different testimony of those lies (under oath):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGxr1VQ2dPI
"They were talking downstairs" becomes "they must have been because that's what I thought they were doing".
It really showed how her story is just whatever she thinks should have happened. Or wants to have happened.
Yes it is in the video, though not the point we are making. That she is creating a story.