Posted on 09/29/2018 2:46:35 AM PDT by TigerClaws
Yeah, that was unbelievable. And the way she asked about the definition was so phony.
Well she is a born liar, we already knew that.
She is not a licensed psychologist, she is a DNC operative who sees a licensed psychologist. She is also a liar; everything about her is lies. She is pathological.
Wow! Thanks for posting.
This gets to the heart of her credibility and honesty.
No doubt the FBI will highlight this in their report. /sarc
It’s insane that nobody is standing up for him. Not even his attorney.
If anyone from Kavanaugh’s camp trolls this site, tell him: Please ditch your married-to-the-MSM attorney and hire someone else. Today hire a private investigator to discredit Ford and her lies. It’s war.
Dr. Ford is not a licensed psychologist, but she is a Psychopath...
There’s no story here. Riding this hobby horse would only bring questions about “Do they really have so little to go after Ford about that they have to push this?”
Ford’s testimony is full of lies.
Even the dates of that house & 2 front doors problem are way off.
I know when I bought /sold every house I have had. NOT that hard.
Records Show Dr. Ford Is Not A Licensed Psychologist, May Have Committed Perjury
BTW Tiger Claws - excellent find and thread.
ridethemiles - Regarding the two front doors and house remodel... About 20 years ago, the IRS cracked down on home office and home business deductions. The IRS stated that the space must be defined, separate and used only for the business purpose. While a homeowner may take itemized deductions for mortgage interest and property taxes, all expenses applicable to the square footage percentage of the home used solely for a business is 100% deductible including all utilities, monthly landscaping service, repairs, cleaning lady, remodel, etc., items not normally deductible at all, in addition to every purchase of paper, pencils, computer equipment, mileage to the post office. When you are self-employed, everything you do is for a business purpose. Adding a second entrance enhances the separate business purpose of the space. I suspect that she writes her papers there, and hosts her “colleagues” for (political) professional meetings. For example, if she made $10,000 from writing papers as a consultant, she received a 1099 not a W2 for wages, so she would want to write-off as much as possible as expenses on a Sch C (or an S-Corp) from the “home-based business” reducing that additional income to close to zero to avoid paying taxes on it.
There is no way to prove this, but it is a far more likely reason why she wanted a separate entrance than her inane fabrication about the second door for her big acting debut before the committee.
Leftist apparatchiks often portray themselves fraudulently.
It would be a good point to forward to the FBI and the conservative press
I’ve always suspected that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson aren’t real “Reverends” either...(sarc)
“I did some checking around, you’re not a licensed therapist!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZahNTpd-0_w
LOLs!
She lied about the extensive remodel and 2nd front door. The building permit was filed in 2008 Palo Alto public records. The 2nd front existed since at least 2011 - she LIED about the remodel being in 2012, the 2nd front door, and the reason for the door.
Photos of her house through the years at this link:
Looks like she lied under oath case closed and time for her to stand trial.
Absolutely true!
No we are not over interpreting what she said. Under California law she is not allowed to use “research psychologist” or for that matter the term “psychologist” at all. This is due to the fact that she is NOT licensed as a psychologist in any state. Using either term makes people believe that she is a psychologist. That is why Stanford changed her bio. They changed it to “Affiliate, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences”. They scrubbed her bio because if the CA state Board of Psychology wanted to, I doubt they will, they could come in and fine both the college and Ford. I’m hoping someone has filed a complaint with the board. What Ford-I refuse to call her a doctor-did by using “psychologist” in her title was make everyone think she is a psychologist when in actual fact she is a statistician that reviews psychology research. I’m a licensed health professional for 24 years and, until this article, I was under the impression she was a licensed psychologist who did research. Now I know she is just a Phd that only teaches and does research. And what’s that saying: Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach.
I am not a psychologist but I am saying that Christine Blasey Ford is CRAZY!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.