Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator
Because he needed two of them to be present on the Committee, if what he's saying is correct, then he basically tricked them to get them to show up, as all of the Rats were prepared to sit it out. I'm not sure that's what really happened, but it's an interesting theory.

My first thought on this theory is that that Article I section 5 of the Constitution requires just 51 senators to be present to conduct business.

Without even looking at the Senate rules, I would think that 51 senators are capable of changing any self-determined Senate rules, such has a minority requirement rule.

What am I missing?

156 posted on 09/28/2018 12:56:36 PM PDT by FreeReign (Rudy: Sessions is recused from everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
They wouldn't bother changing the rules. The Senate does not have to rely on any committee to conduct its business. McConnell could have scheduled a vote on the matter without having any input from the Judiciary Committee at all.

This works better politically for the GOP, though.

164 posted on 09/28/2018 1:02:31 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson