“It would have been counter-productive to go there. The only reason that would come up if something did occur that required her consent. In this case, its immaterial.”
Disagree. Heavy drinking impairs memory. If she was a habitual drunk she might not remember correctly.
“If she was a habitual drunk she might not remember correctly.”
—
That would be a knife that cuts both ways - a male drunk wouldn’t be any better. No need to make it a major point.
She testified that she had not had a drink before coming to that house and only one beer (drink?) after she got there. If the other guy will testify under penalty of law that this did not happen, they were not there, and they were not drunk, then the Republicans ought to be insisting that he be brought in. The fact they are not raises questions.