I didn’t advocate shouting at the witness. I advocate never having the hearing, and voting last week. But since that didn’t happen, this is a big lose. Nothing was presented to discredit the core claim.
They needed the hearing for cover to get the votes. If some Senators weren't holding back their votes in exchange for a hearing so they could claim they she was allowed to say her piece they would have already held the vote. How hard is that to understand?
Inconsistencies are precisely how you discredit the testimony of a witness—here the one making the core claims!