Posted on 09/27/2018 6:39:06 AM PDT by nikos1121
Holy shit. I don’t know what exuplatory means is. But I have a PHD and am teaching at Stanford.
She has problems remembering even current information.
A college professor does not know what “exculpatory” means?
OMG this woman has a doctorate degree and she doesnt know what exculpatory means!!! GIVE ME A BREAK!!!
Her best friend has never met the Judge and said so in a letter.She says her best friend was there.Whatttt.
This is the problem right here - there is no corroboration for her story. This can only remain in the political theater because there is a ton of reasonable doubt in the criminal realm. It is covered in reasonable doubt..... no corroboration, statements to the contrary, large gaps in the recollection and a shifting story, etc etc. Frankly, using a criminal standard it is not even meeting probable cause. That requires evidence and when your only evidence is a shifting narrative about something that occurred 36 years ago that other persons present deny it is not the basis for anything.
The audience is mostly applying a criminal justice standard, but the Senators are immersed in the politics and optics. Their time would be better spent examining the “motives” of her advocates from start to finish, the suspicious timing ala DiFi, and her past associations that provide her with motive to do this.
Weigh the evidence - an unprovable allegation with holes and questionable motive vs a man with an impeccable reputation. It is too bad that objectivity has been thrown out the window, but I still believe he will be confirmed. If not, we have become a banana republic.
Yes, and we don't have all damn day, this isn't a deposition. We have limited time, she has GOT to cut to the chase.
Sen. Whitehouse is building a giagantic strawman. Hey, remember that these allegations only came to light after the nomination hearing had concluded.
who is this guy talking right now
When it comes time for Lindsey Graham to talk he needs to take over and talk for himself and grill her ass.
AND....she said she had only one beer.
Exactly. Ford named the witnesses and they all testified it never happen. How is that being credible?
She has a PhD but doesn’t know the meaning of “exculpatory evidence”. I give up.
Kavanaugn was on a public list of SC picks in mainstream news coverage in 2012 when Romney was the presidential candidate. Sane year she started this stunt.
She has problems remembering even current information.
She seemed surprise and shaken when she saw the map.
She likes to say hippocampus
Who drove you home?
How did you find/notify them?
Cell phone?
Does one casually approach a boy who had assaulted you and say “Hello” as Dr. Ford has testified she did with Mark Judge at the Safeway 4 to 6 weeks later?
I look forward to that. When is he coming up?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.