Posted on 09/25/2018 4:03:19 PM PDT by detective
Shortened title.
Full tile: Document Expert: Multiple Discrepancies Discovered in Senator Feinstein’s Christine Ford Letter – Looks Like a Fraud
Another Internet sleuth released a series of tweets that are damning to the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from Dr. Ford who accused Judge Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct nearly 40 years ago.
The Internet is the place where individuals with different backgrounds and skill sets are able to combine their efforts to address the many lies in the MSM today. This happens all the time and the MSM hates it when their lies are uncovered or questioned.
Yesterday Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal released a series of tweets that dissect and refute the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh. Dr. Ford’s letter is full of flaws which lead one to realize something just doesn’t add up!
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
And incur the wrath of those highly placed Dem politicians she has been working with as well as thousands of moonbat crazy Progressive street activists? Not to mention all of her liberal friends and colleagues.
I think I'd rather walk into a prison yard and start yelling vile epithets about neo-nazis, blacks and Hispanics.
She is correct. The apostrophe indicates possession. The "1980s" are not possessing anything in this sentence.
If she were talking about the 1980's fashions or the 1980's undercurrent vs the 90's discontent, that would be correct.
It was probably faxed from Eschoo to Feinstein - hence the ugly shift in font height, characteristic of faxing (which remains a stupid standard of quasi legal communications).
Most people who shriek “omg inconsistent fonts” don’t know what they’re talking about. Irritates the hell out of those of us who can discern edits from artifacts.
what is Ashoo’s writing style? or rather, an aide taking down notes.
Well, yes. I was already informed of that when I lost the spelling bee. Now go tell pnut22.
I wasn’t questioning that she was right abut the apostrophe. I was just taught to write out dates in a letter.
“It was probably faxed”
There is no fax header.
Be interesting to find out, right?
There are more issues than just the ones she spots and brings up. Blumenthal may realize some of these issues she doesn’t mention too, helping her to her overall conclusions. The sentence structures used are extremely awkward in their composition. They include multiple people who could be the subject of verbs in sentences. There are many sentences where an experienced writer would separate separate ideas into separate sentences rather than try to combine them all in one sentence creating confusion and grounds for possible mockery of what was written. “Precluding any successful attempts to yell for help”, this sentence sounds like it was written either by a lawyer or with the consultation of a lawyer. Why didn’t you yell for help? I answered it here, idiot! I was precluded. One can go on and on on this letter.
“Physically pushed me into a bedroom”, how could one push someone nonphysically. Whoever wrote this is trying to create records of a physical assault, so they are taking care to use the word physical. She was headed for a bathroom “up a short stairwell from the living room” when she was pushed. The way she writes this it makes a crtic want to ask if she was pushed all the way up the stairs, which wouldn’t be an easy way to push someone. I understand what the author(s) was teying to do here though. When Mike Tyson was accused of rape his defenders said the lady went into his bedroom, she knew what was up. The author(s) here are trying to establish a nonvoluntary bedroom entrance and occupation status regarding Christine Blasey Ford. She was trying to go to the bathroom, not the bedroom, her supporters can now say. Again here a lawyer may have contributed to how this was stated.
“Both loudly stumbled down the stairwell.” She was in the bathroom with the door locked and didn’t see this. How would she know they stumbled? Sounds again like a lawyer was consulted to try to emphasize that the two makes were drunk. Also notice how the description kind of dehumanizes the two males and tries to make them merely a subject of mockery. It is like the writer. is trying to be funny here. The clumsy oaf males stumbled down the stairs, they prefer stumbling to walking and are such clumsy oafs they can’t even walk down stairs properly is what she is trying to say. That is clearly the attitude. So the author(s) may have been a feminist and/or a liberal. In fact I view that as likely.
Oh, sorry! I was taught that also, but in today’s world, I”m learning to dumb down my writing. No more writing out numbers one through ten, now it’s all just 1-10. I still don’t automatically find the numbers on my keyboard.
Doesn’t have to be.
That the one lines is vertically stretched (nobody picks a font that looks like that) then the next is squished and slightly angled top vs bottom is a typical fax paper slip.
The style of scientific papers differs substantially from that of ordinary everyday narratives. You are not likely to find similarities in vocabulary, and other similarities won't be as clear-cut or decisive. Moreover, her books and papers have co-authors, so it would be hard to get a sense of what her personal writing style is. And of course, editors and proofreaders have a lot to do with determining what the final product looks like. A copy of her thesis might give you a somewhat better picture of how she writes.
“That’s not a comma; it’s an apostrophe.”
It’s a “high comma,” or so I’ve heard it called.
The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe.
I think it's clear that somebody else had a hand in writing the letter, and that this may not be an actual copy of the letter but rather a later print-out of its contents. But I'm not entirely sure that if she produced the letter all on her own it would have been better written. In other words, I'm a little skeptical of the high regard the analyst has of Ph.D.s and of the idea that they'd always employ a high, clear, and correct style.
it wasn't signed by her either so it needs to be authenticated..I believe Dr. Ford claimed the facts stated and Feinstein submitted the letter to the committee..
They are so stupid. They wrote this letter in advance of finding the person to put forth as the victim. They assumed it would be a less educated person and wrote in that style. Though some of it is just stupid mistakes. It was also likely written the first time in advance of Gorsuch’s nomination.
Boy....
Talk about the proper use of the ‘
If it is the letter that Feinstein gave the committee, then it is not redacted but edited with different font an size.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.