[a little elbow grease]

"I’m going to ping my list here because of what I think is happening:"

___________

Thanks for the heads up.

You know Larry that I suggested to you (privately) months ago that your intelligent and thoughtful observations would be more understandable if YOU WOULD BLOW OFF YOUR CHOSEN "NICKNAMES".

You lose a great percentage of your "audience" by using your silly nicknames.

After all, there are many reading your remarks who are not familiar with those silly (yet sometimes humorous) nicknames.

Drop them for important messages, which I assume you think this post is.

Your nicknames are not required or helpful here for beneficial effect.

Sorry the truth..... from a fan and most likely always a fan.

[Alberta's Child]

Lost in all this was the likelihood that not only was Balless Edsel lying about her experience, but that the lies would be so exposed that in fact it would drag FinkStink herself into the fray.

I agree with this 100%. I'll add one more observation here:

Look at what has happened over the last 24 hours with: (1) the emergence of this fourth non-corroborating "corroborating witness," and (2) the addition of former Federal prosecutor and DOJ Inspector General Michael Bromwich to Ford's legal team.

I believe Christine Ford is now at the point where her personal interests in all potential criminal and legal matters are in conflict with the interests of Dianne Feinstein, the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and the Democrat Party itself.

[LS]

The nicknames serve several purposes, one of which is to act as a cover for me on Twitter algorhythms.

So far, they have worked. I have not been banned even for 24 hours in two years.