[pepsi_junkie]

I suggested here yesterday, based on the non-denial denial made by Kavenaugh's fried who was also accused, that it might just be possible that (1) the woman actually was assaulted, explaining why the friend didn't outright deny but only claimed no recollection andn that (2) Kavanaugh is telling the truth too and had nothing to do with it and the woman is either mistakenly identifying him or purposely misidentifying him.

Kavanaugh clearly read my post and is taking my lead here. Don't call the woman a liar, just say you never did that and you were never there. Implication: if it happened at all, it was someone else. But don't get into a fight calling her a liar. The way the world works nowadays they feminist outrage engine would just pounce on that.

[Steely Tom]

Kavanaugh clearly read my post and is taking my lead here. Don't call the woman a liar, just say you never did that and you were never there. Implication: if it happened at all, it was someone else. But don't get into a fight calling her a liar. The way the world works nowadays they feminist outrage engine would just pounce on that.

Exactly. Calling her "a liar" would allow the MSM-Democrats to "nationalize the off-year election," which we don't want.

[petitfour]

Clearly.

LOL