Sorry, but if you watched that video and found her to be incoherent or mentally deficient, you are simply showing your political bias.
There may be examples out there showing her being mentally impaired, but as someone who has had the privilege of many conversations with elderly individuals, there is nothing in that video that remotely suggest any mental deficiency of this individual.
I do not agree with her politics, and disagree highly with many of the rulings and reasoning she has offered for them, but the claim that that video displays any sort of mental deficiency or incoherence by the Judge is complete lies and bias.
You wish to push conspiracy theories, that this interview was staged, and scripted, then please provide evidence for your claims, otherwise, you are just showing your own personal political bias, and look exactly like the type of animal I stated people pushing this video as some sort of evidence of her mental decline look like.
——————
I did not say she was incoherent.
I simply stated that she has diminished capacity and she is not as sharp as she once was. It also seemed to me that she was regurgitating pre formulated and rehearsed answers to the interviewer questions.
That Ginsberg is not as sharp as she once was obvious and perfectly understandable. In recent interviews and unstated public appearances RBG has been incoherent, rambling and confused.
Don’t have any great love for RGB, but go to YouTube and watch her speak at various functions over her career and you earn she was very sharp and able to think on her feet .
She clearly has declined mentally from even a few years ago and she is much diminished from her earlier mental state. No sure she is up to complex legal review and decision making
“Sorry, but if you watched that video and found her to be incoherent or mentally deficient, you are simply showing your political bias.”
I did and do. Why are you defending RBG, a domestic enemy of the Constitution? That’s the real question.