Posted on 09/10/2018 2:04:57 PM PDT by SMGFan
Frank Newport, editor-in-chief at the Gallup Poll, on Monday said that data analyst websites, not national polls, were the ones incorrect in their 2016 presidential election predictions.
The national polling was actually one of the more accurate years where they correctly predicted the popular vote, Newport said to Hill.TV's Joe Concha, referring to national polls.
But one of the things that happened was an overreliance on these models where various individuals and various companies put together these scientific-sounding probabilistic models, he continued.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
I was getting polled 3-4 times a week until Nov 2016.
Since then? NADA.
Just respond back with a question.
"What are you wearing?" and
"Will you be my friend?" are good ones.
They needed to poll more Russians...
DK
What used to work no longer does; fake polls, totally made up to convince the ignorant to either give up and not vote, or to stay home because their Enemy Domestic is way ahead by 15 points.
Their pathetic "New Tricks" bag is now empty.
Expecting Hillary’s performance with black voters to equal Obama’s didn’t help either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.