Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cotton1706

I saw that exchange last night and it was indeed odd and Kavanaugh was visibly thrown for a loop. I thought his response was credible. He basically said he’s discussed the case with other judges and that if the Senator could provide a name he could confirm or deny as he didn’t know everyone who worked at that law firm. She would not give out a name (in other words, did you discuss this case with ‘x’).

When she asked that question, she also made comments such as, be very specific and also said something to the effect of this is a very specific question. She kept pressing him on different subjects and it was odd I thought when she said things like you’re not going to answer this so we’ll move on.

I think the game plan there was to possibly force him to recuse himself if any Mueller investigation items ever went to the Supreme Court for a ruling (such as forcing the President to go under oath at a grand jury).


4 posted on 09/06/2018 4:28:54 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Old Teufel Hunden

“I think the game plan there was to possibly force him to recuse himself if any Mueller investigation...”

One Rat came out and asked him that, point blank.

After Sessions’ recusal on... well... everything, I cringe when I hear that word any more.


7 posted on 09/06/2018 4:35:45 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Have an A-1 day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
possibly force him to recuse himself if ...

'Rats have no standing to force recusal on any SCOTUS judge.


36 posted on 09/06/2018 4:58:59 AM PDT by C210N (Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
I can see her motive. However, a non-answer to an ambiguous question about an unknown person, is proper. In other words, he's not going to guess who she's talking about.

She has nothing.....If she had something it should be a direct question....Have you ever advised the President regarding the Mueller witch hunt?

In other words, she's running her own little witch hunt.

56 posted on 09/06/2018 5:17:05 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

RIGHT.....the whole idea is to make it so Kavanaugh must recuse himself on X Y and Z and Mueller-Russia when he is on the Supreme Court.

The good part is though Kavanaugh was blindsided he will be ready today and any day this BS is brought up again.


72 posted on 09/06/2018 5:32:51 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
I think the game plan there was to possibly force him to recuse himself if any Mueller investigation items ever went to the Supreme Court for a ruling (such as forcing the President to go under oath at a grand jury).

Why should he?
Neither Andrew Wesissman (for his contacts with Bruce Ohr before the Mueller investigation), nor Rod Rosenstein ( for signing FISA warrants based on fake dossiers from Hilary campaign), have excused themselves.

77 posted on 09/06/2018 5:34:47 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Yes OTH, this was my reaction as well. Her question came out of left field, Coach K was on the defensive, and she persisted as a prosecutor with all the goods on her target.

Because she gave no specifics to K, it was extremely unfair. and an inference that Kavanaugh was somehow part of the Russia conspiracy (i.e. the Russia-linked judged hand-picked to clear Trump). Her questioning had been set up all day by other Dems asking K about when he was added to the Trump lists of potential SCOtUS nominees.

Like you, I thought this was another Dem stunt to potentially force his recusal down the road.

With Trump making progress in the Black electorate, the Dems are likely planning to run Harris or Booker in 2020...very transparent forum (Coach K hearings) to raise their profiles. Media will likely run with the Harris prosecution tape today!


130 posted on 09/06/2018 9:32:41 AM PDT by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson