Posted on 08/17/2018 6:13:58 PM PDT by Proud White Trump Supporter
Original Title: Corrupt Democrat Senator Mark Warner to Introduce Amendment to Block Trump From Arbitrarily Revoking Security Clearances
....Snip....
The fake news media and Democrats said President Trump revoking Brennans security clearance is an effort to suppress freedom of speechhaving a security clearance is a privilege, not a right, but that didnt stop the left from spreading propaganda.
On Friday, Vice Chair of the corrupt Senate Intel Committee, Mark Warner (D-VA) said he will be introducing an amendment next week to block Trump from arbitrarily revoking security clearances, reported FOX News Congress reporter Chad Pergram.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Why isn’t Warner in jail for leaking to the NYT?
Bills have no power over the President and his Constitutional authority
Zilch
Only the Constitution itself can be amended to remove authorities granted to him thereby
Everything else is mental masturbation by Congress
#2, “Insanity is strong in this one”. Yoda
Get the guillotine for this idiot, he’s too stupid to corrupt the USA ...
God forgive me, but he looks like he is in the final stages of some horrible STD. His face is just plain unsightly.
Heres whats being missed in all these articles about Brennan, security clearances are for those who have a need to know. Brennan as an individual has nothing to do with the problem. NONE, not a single one of the past members of anything, currently have a need to know anything. These should have ALL been pulled years ago. No one not presently working in the role they previously had should have ANY clearance unless they are presently in another role in government and then their clearance should have been changed to match that role. All of the EX-anythings, including and especially Obama-Clinton-Bush lackeys, need to have all of their clearances pulled as soon as possible.
God save our queer old dean.
Funny how the libs make up there own constitutional laws as they go.
"Arbitrarily?!" Like, yuh mean, "without Due Process of Law?!"
That's un-Constitutional, isn't it?
Say, where in the Bill of Rights does it say anything about Security Clearances?
Regards,
...”Amendment.......
Like in the Constitution??
The Dork is strong in this one.”...
Has Mark Warner read the Constitution?
When my driving license is suspended for whatever reason, I think I will use the excuse that they are stopping me from being able to make a living. Think the judge will be sympathetic?
Why didn’t he introduce a bill for ending Trump’s presidency? Why the subterfuge?
Never attempt to analyze insanity.
I doubt it, I truly do...
Well the FBI would have us believe that Hillary is that ignorant of the security process.
Its unconstitutional... the President has the right to manage the executive branch as he sees fit and that includes granting, extending and revoking security clearances.
Congress has no say in it under the separation of powers and John Brennan isnt a government official.
Congress doesnt have that authority..
Due to separation of powers isnt that the purview of the executive branch?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.