Protestant "proofs" are either points no one disagrees with them, or peculiar interpretation of verses taken out of context. "Faith alone" is one such theological fantasy.
How do you think those within the Christian faith communities determined what were the major tenets of Christianity?
Why, the Catholic priests taught them according to the Sacred Tradition of the Church. Yes, they taught with the voice of Christ (John 10:27-28).
There are many problems with what you stated. One problem with what you have written; the Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic split in 1,000 AD. So who was wrong in their teachings "according to the Sacred Tradition of the Church??
Like THIS??
Protestant "proofs" are either points no one disagrees with them, or peculiar interpretation of verses taken out of context. "Faith alone" is one such theological fantasy.Just to be clear...How do you think those within the Christian faith communities determined what were the major tenets of Christianity?
Why, the Catholic priests taught them according to the Sacred Tradition of the Church. Yes, they taught with the voice of Christ (John 10:27-28).
Is this an example of you "demolishing a protestant theological fantasy??"
If it is, I don't want anyone to miss it.
[psst.... by the way, all you did was make assertions without proof]
You mean you believe typical Catholic strawman that sola fide meant a faith which would not produce works was salvific, and that the justified in Protestantism was merely a whitewashed sinner, versus one who would not characteristically follow Christ being damned? Answer clearly.
Why, the Catholic priests taught them according to the Sacred Tradition of the Church. Yes, they taught with the voice of Christ (John 10:27-28).
And again, just what is your basis for assurance that they the separate class of sacerdotal Catholic priests taught with the voice of Christ?
I should be back tonite.