Replies

"Very simple to understand, very much part of cyberwarfare. You set trap doors, you leave certain backdoors open."

That wasn't a back door, that was the front door that Q left wide open. DES was crackable 20 years ago. You don't even need to crack that stuff, rainbow tables compiled at the time made less then 10 character passwords just the simple matter of a database look up.

"When a hacker enters a backdoor, they leave a trace behind them. Sophisticated hackers can clean up before leaving but real-time recordings capture their info before they wipe it."

Watching the hacker work on your system in real-time before he cleans up his traces is not going to help you track him back to his origination. It will let you know how he got in and what he did while he was there, but it won't help you find out where he came from because he was never there.

Any state sponsored hacker will have a well developed network of constantly mutating cutouts that keeps his location untraceable. There simply is no tracking a hacker back to his location when he is routing through commercial VPNs, dark VPNs, hacked routers and custom networks designed by the intel agency itself - unless he makes an error and gives it away himself. And, in the rare cases where you can track him back to his location, it is just as likely that you tracked him back to the location that he wanted you to find. Before you do the crime, decide who the patsy is going to be.

"They can also be tagged with ‘beacons’ that transmit where they are, what location they are returning to or originated from."

Nope, those days are long gone. State sponsored hackers are not revealing their locations with "beacons." Nowadays hacking is done by large, distributed, automated systems that profile and fingerprint their targets over a span of time and locations that make backtracking, especially with beacons, impossible.

"Secondly, and easy to understand, Q is not going to be using top security to communicate with Anons because Anons have to have account access; giving them high level security accounts is not going to happen."

Seriously? The anons couldn't have handled any security better than DES with 8 character passwords. And the published "tripcode" used to verify each Q post? Talk about a structural error. Why not just give the hackers a way to use their high speed crackers off-line? Oh, that's right... they did - not that they needed them with the security Q was using.

"Thirdly, Q has now been doing this for almost a year with very few incidents and quick response when incidents do occur. It’s not like break-ins are going to penetrate national security infrastructure."

The hackers didn't break in. They deciphered Q's password which allowed them to post under his name. If Q has more than posting rights on the web site he's using then he's making another serious error. Compartmentalization. It's a good thing. Of course, anyone using an 8 character password while saving the world is probably making more than a few errors.

Look at you, writing your epistle on Cyber ops.

Well Mr. Expert, then how do you reconcile the NSA has FULL VIEW of everything?

DES is substandard today and Blockchain has backdoors accessible by NSA.

There is NOTHING in the Cyber and communications world, NOTHING, including Ham radios that The Hammer can’t surveil 24/7.

Further, your physical movement is tracked by NGA which is bigger than NSA.

Further again, your smartphone can be controlled even as you use it. The cameras can be on without your knowing while audio and video are streamed without ever showing up as a hit to your data plan, and this can be done when your phone is off.

Q is communicating on unsecure systems because Anons will never be given account access to high level secure infrastructure.

The asinine argument that Q is proven fraudulent because Q uses unsecure internet arrangements FAILS.