[Lazamataz]

CNN has switched from euphoria over a presumed Danny O'Connor win to gloating that this is a "moral victory for Democrats" even though it has appeared that Balderson has won. "The intensity is clearly still on the Democrats' side!" They're discussing how Trump's support in suburban districts across the US has drastically fallen... and that bodes well for DemocRATs in the mid-terms.

There were only three scenarios, and thus, only three CNN responses.

Scenario One: O'Connor wins. CNN declares that this shows a Blue Wave in November.

Scenario Two: Close Balderson Win. CNN declares that this shows that Trump support has crashed, which means a Blue Wave in November.

Scenario Three: BLOWOUT Balderson Win. CNN declares that this shows that Russians hacked the election, which Mueller will stop, which means a Blue Wave in November.

[snarkytart]

They do understand that this will be done all over again in November. hence the low R turn out.

[nutmeg]

From what I just saw/heard on CNN: It’s definitely Scenario #2. They’re still predicting the Blue Wave...

[Jemian]

Moral victories = LOSES!

[centurion316]

"moral victory for Democrats"

In other words, the 2000 Presidential Election: Sore Loserman.

[Lazamataz]

There were only three scenarios, and thus, only three CNN responses.

Scenario One: O'Connor wins. CNN declares that this shows a Blue Wave in November.

Scenario Two: Close Balderson Win. CNN declares that this shows that Trump support has crashed, which means a Blue Wave in November.

Scenario Three: BLOWOUT Balderson Win. CNN declares that this shows that Russians hacked the election, which Mueller will stop, which means a Blue Wave in November.

You know what I love about liberal lunatics?

They're so predictable.

Actress Alyssa Milano Blames Russians for Ohio Loss