Posted on 08/03/2018 8:43:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Paul Manafort. Tony Podesta. Tad Devine. Greg Craig.
Manafort worked for Trump. Tony Podesta is the brother of Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. Tad Devine was Bernie Sanders’ chief strategist. Greg Craig was Obama’s White House Counsel.
All four men also, directly or indirectly, allegedly did work for the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine. And the ECFMU was allegedly a front for Yanukovich's Ukrainian pro-Russian faction. Manafort and the Podesta Group had failed to register as foreign agents. Tad Devine had worked for Manafort on the Ukraine project. Craig had written a report on Ukraine for one of Manafort’s lobbying efforts.
But only Manafort had the predawn raid, the solitary confinement and the high profile show trial. Mueller referred Podesta’s case to the Southern District of New York, which has been doing some of his dirty work, even though the Podesta Group was based out of Washington D.C. Tad Devine was called as the first witness at Manafort’s trial. (Next up was Daniel Rabin, a Democrat ad man who had worked with Manafort on Ukraine and who had worked on Martin O’Malley’s presidential campaign. O’Malley’s partner had been O’Malley’s campaign manager and was a former Obama senior advisor.)
Podesta, Devine and Craig are getting a pass because it’s not really about Manafort. It’s about Trump.
The Federal courthouse in Alexandria where the trial is taking place may be the final stop of a political hit job that makes the ECFMU look like amateurs. Its tentacles bind together the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, national security agencies, a former British intel agent, a firm of former journalists and a scandal bigger than Watergate. But in Alexandria, the hit job may have met its match.
Until now, the Mueller coup had gotten exactly the judges that it wanted.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee and Clinton donor, had been shepherding the Manafort case while giving the Mueller gang everything they wanted. And then there was Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama nominee and Dem donor who was friends with Andrew Weissmann, the most aggressive figure on Mueller's team, who tore up Manafort's attorney-client privilege.
But now Judge T. Ellis is presiding over the Manafort trial and the free ride is over. Ellis, as the media is fond of reminding us in every one of its feverish stories about the trial, is a Reagan appointee. But due to a Democrat congress, Reagan appointees were a mixed bag. Unlike Judge Jackson and Judge Howell, Judge Ellis hasn’t favored a side. Instead he he’s refused to put up with any nonsense from either side.
The Mueller gang realized that the free ride was over when back in May when Judge Ellis directly called out the prosecution over its real motives in bringing the case.
“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort,” he snapped. “You really care about what information Mr. Manafort can give you to lead to Mr. Trump.”
Judge Ellis wasn’t happy at being used as a prop in a fake trial whose only purpose was to pressure Manafort into turning on Trump. Unlike the previous rubber stamp judges, Ellis showed little patience with Mueller’s nasty habit of treating everything involving the case as top secret. He demanded to know the limits of Mueller’s authority and a copy of the unredacted DOJ memo on which it was based.
And he got it.
The Manafort trial was not to mention Russian collusion, oligarchs and most of the staples of the media’s obsessive coverage of the case. While the media and the protesters howled outside, Judge Ellis kept order inside the courtroom. Even the reporters covering the case were not allowed to speak those words to each other. As the trial proceeded, the media wasn’t getting its money’s worth.
And Judge Ellis had his share of fun at their expense, at one point referring to reporters as having "scurried out of here like rats out of a sinking ship" after a particularly troubling development.
While Mueller and the media want to drag out their show trial for as long as possible, Judge Ellis has made it very clear that he wants to get the trial over and done with as quickly as possible. His favorite phrase in the case has been, “move along.” The Mueller gang had built much of its case around showcasing Manafort’s lavish lifestyle. And Ellis has been disdainful of the prosecution’s theatrics.
He’s refused to allow the prosecution to parade photos of Manafort’s expensive clothing before the jury and he dismissed efforts by the prosecution to play the class warfare card in the Alexandria courtroom.
The pointless tour of luxury clothing vendors through the courtroom was deflated by Ellis’ impatience and the only thing it established is that Manafort had bought expensive suits with international wire transfers. And that could have easily been established in a fraction of the time without dragging in witnesses to testify to Manafort’s shopping habits.
After wasting two days on showcasing luxury clothing store vendors and Democrat political pros like Tad Devine and Daniel Rabin, the prosecution went right back to talking up the size of Manafort’s pond and the price of his karaoke machine before shifting over to more serious testimony from financial pros. Some of these witnesses had received immunity in exchange for their testimony against Manafort.
And yet the obsession with Manafort’s suits, karaoke machine and pond reveal the hollowness of the case. If the prosecution really had Manafort down cold, it wouldn’t need to talk about his ostrich jacket. There are only two purposes to such theatrics, to bias the jury or to play to the cheap seats in the media.
As Judge Ellis had already pointed out, the trial really isn’t about Manafort. It’s about Trump. And Manafort is Mueller’s last and only hope. After all the pressure, Manafort still hasn’t given Mueller what he wants. And so the Mueller gang needs to score as hard as it can in either this trial or the next one. If Manafort walks or gets off with a slap on the wrist, the Mueller investigation is effectively over. It may drag on for another five years, as special counsel circuses have been known to do, but it will be over.
And everyone knows it.
Democrat judges had lent Mueller a hand until now. But the actual case is now in the hands of a judge who doesn’t like Mueller, doesn’t like his people’s tactics and doesn’t like being used as a pawn.
Unlike the Democrat judges with an axe to grind, Judge Ellis is following the law. And he hasn’t gone outside it to favor either side. Nor is there any reason to believe that he will. He has questioned and challenged the agenda behind the trial, but he will leave it up to a jury to come up with a verdict.
And yet the wind has gone out of the prosecution’s sails.
The friendly relationship that the gang enjoyed with its fellow Democrat collaborators on the bench has been replaced by an impatient judge who isn’t treating the show trial like a vital institution, but with the skeptical impatience that veterans of the system reserve for the table pounders wasting their time.
Judge Ellis isn’t interested in a show trial. He’s asked the prosecution whether it thinks George Soros is also an oligarch. He’s made it clear that while he knows the agenda behind the case, there won’t be a Russiagate circus in his courtroom, no paranoid hysteria or sinister speculation. Nor will the case be allowed to linger on endlessly attracting swarms of reporters, activists and deep staters.
Manafort may well be convicted, but it won’t be on the terms that Mueller wanted. Mueller may get Manafort, but lose Trump.
He may win the battle in Alexandria, but lose the war.
A real judge knows a frame up when he sees one. Mueller threatening people with prison if they don’t lie and give him what he wants should be illegal.
Mueller didn’t shop the right judge or pay the judge enough.
Mueller should be the one on trial.
Judge Ellis needs to read this, pronto.
ITEM——Hillary Clinton ran in the 2008 ad 2016 Democratic primaries and in the 2016 general election.
ITEM——S/C Mueller “uncovered” that the Russian scheme seems to have (cough) “materialized” at some point in 2014.
Now, here’s the $64,000 question Mueller’s not addressing:
Why didn’t the CIA or the NSA or the FBI pick this up? Were Obama’s PDB’s falsified?
CIA’s Brennan has been outed as working the phony “pee dossier” into Obama’s PDB’s.
Dates are important b/c Snowden’s’ revelations indicate:
<><>Obama’s government spying apparatus began capturing all electronic data on everyone in the U.S. in 2001.
<><>The Obama police state succeeded in mastering the capture of all keystrokes, telephone calls and digital traffic by 2005.
This we know:
<><>(A) that NSA traffic travels through FBI computers, and,
<><> (B) that the CIA keeps constant tabs on Russian spies in Russia....... and elsewhere.
BOOM
Prosecutors have some of the greatest immunity from lawsuit of any group in the United States.
Mueller is the one that did not inform congress that the principals buying 20% of our Uranium production were being investigated for bribery, money laundering and corruption at the same time as they were applying for the purchase.
As the head of the FBI at the time, Muller acted as the ‘fixer’ for Hillary Clinton.
That is a crime for which Muller should be investigated and prosecuted.
2001 and 2005 predate Obama’s installation in the oval office.
Will Mueller Buy the Jury ?
It’s a NoVA/DC jury, they don’t need to be bought, they’re already part of the cult of leftism.
My dream scenario:
The GOP holds the House, and increases its representation in the Senate to at least 55.
The President fires Jeff Sessions on the day the new Senators are sworn in.
The President nominates as Attorney General an individual with unassailable credentials, who the GOP dominant Senate will have to confirm in short order.
The new AG immediately terminates Rosenstein and Wray, replacing them with solid law and order individuals with a proven track record.
The new AG authorizes a special prosecutor to look into Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein, Strzok, Ohr, etc., with respect to their conspiracy to oust the President, including fabricated evidence, misleading the courts, failure to recuse themselves in the face of obvious conflicts.
The new AG authorizes a new investigation into the sale of uranium to the Russians, including the involvement of Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller, Hilary Clinton and others.
The new AG appoints a new special counsel to replace Mueller, who is removed from his position because he is under investigation for potential crimes related to Russia, with a mandate to conclude the investigation into whether the Trump campaign knowingly received or requested assistance from the Russian government, or knowingly received unlawful campaign contributions from Russia. The new special counsel is specifically instructed to remove anyone from his team who has contributed to any political party in the previous 5 years.
All other potential crimes, including charges against Manafort, are reassigned to existing DOJ prosecutors, as they have nothing to do with the Trump campaign.
The new AG commences a top to bottom review of the DOJ and FBI to ferret out anyone who has used government resources for political ends. Bring in new blood if necessary from different states, instead of relying on the career DOJ lawyers who have been living in the DC swamp.
Mueller has just been getting away with it for years.
It is for a new AG to appoint a special prosecutor to reopen Hillary's email investigation. Someone without the partisan bent to let her off the hook so she could become president without a felony crime hanging over her head, like Comey and Lynch did.
That and the pay-for-pay scheme Hillary was running out the State department, to the benefit of the Clinton foundation.
To see her in federal penitentiary would be like a golfer getting a hole-in-one.
If Mueller loses he’ll simply find some new evidence and resubmit. It’s a rigged game with the government winning app. 95% of the time.
My hope is that if Manafort is found guilty, that he gets a sentence of time served and walks out of the courtroom a free man.
My hope is that if Manafort is found guilty, that he gets a sentence of time served and walks out of the courtroom a free man.
God bless this amazingly insightful judge.
The point is..... Obama latched onto it and let the govt apparat be used against innocent people..... and a candidate.
Great article.
stringing it along for so long has got the leftists much of what they want
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.