WATCH: Sarah Sanders Asked About QAnon at Press Briefing

heavy.com ^ | 08/01/2018 | Staff

[JockoManning]

Our President is not a shy fellow. IF he was supporting this Q person he wouldn't be hinting around about it.

IF

POTUS had YOUR constructions on reality,
YOUR thought processes,
YOUR goals in all this,
YOUR sequencing agenda,
YOUR ASSUMPTIONS,
YOUR conclusions,
YOUR priorities,
YOUR psychology,
YOUR sociological understandings,
YOUR preferences,
YOUR ...,

Which, evidently being smarter, he mercifully doesn't have.

However, you might prepare your apology rationalization, statement of shock--whatever. At the rate he and things are moving, he's likely to come out forcefully speaking or tweeting his whole-hearted support and direction of Q-Anon almost any day now. My guess is that it will most likely be within 1-5 weeks.

[JockoManning]

Now I wonder . . . why might the MSM and their minions and puppet masters have some fiercely panicked concern about a growing movement well aware of their pedophilia, toddler & baby raping, child sacrifice and cannibalism; their horrific financial corruption and their high treason . . . why oh why might they be rabidly frothing at the mouth that such an informed and fiercely patriotic group in vigorous knowledgeable support of POTUS' goals and efforts to clean out the swamp . . . why oh why would such evil doers be the slightest concerned? . . . it's soooooooooooo mystifying! /sarc

[JockoManning]

AMEN!

[JockoManning]

Yeah. That one was fascinating, indeed. Haven’t checked for the new drops, yet.

[Boogieman]

“Now ask yourself why on earth would the President of the united states go all this time and not make a statement to the effect that Q was fake?”

Probably because as President of the United States he doesn’t have time to worry about stupid anonymous internet trolls. Maybe he even imagines his base should be smart enough to figure out that anonymous internet trolls who have already proven themselves to be fraudulent are not to be taken seriously.

[Boogieman]

Sorry, I’m on the side of truth and rationality. That’s never the wrong side.

[Boogieman]

“it all seemed deliberately ambiguous and/or vague”

Exactly. Just like people who write horoscopes or telephone psychics. That way, no matter what happens, they can pretend it fits their predictions by some torturous interpretation.

However, Q’s early predictions on 4chan were not vague or ambiguous at all. They were very specific. They also turned out to be completely and demonstrably wrong.

After that fiasco, he moved to 8chan and started with all the vaguery. I’m still stupified that so many suckers continued to follow him after that epic fail.

[JockoManning]

He has tweeted over a LOT LESS significant issues, events, etc.

[JockoManning]

NO.

You are merely on the side of a perceptual handicap. You have a built-in incapacity to pick the hidden faces out of the picture. There are very logical reasons for that but I've grown weary of articulating them. There's also likely some willful blindness included with the perceptual incapacity.

[JockoManning]

It will be a delight to see some folks’ smug pontifications crash and burn spectacularly.

[Boogieman]

“Significant” is a subjective thing. Just because you think Q has some significance doesn’t mean the President has to. He’s busy dealing with things in the real world, not the imaginary world of people wishing they were part of something important on the internet.

[Boogieman]

“You have a built-in incapacity to pick the hidden faces out of the picture.”

This is a hilariously ironic attempt at an insult, considering that most Q believers seems to suffer from some serious apophenia. I’ll take it as a compliment.

[JockoManning]

POTUS doesn’t have to do a lot of things. It is just obvious that HE HAS CHOSEN to set up the Q-Anon team and to very strategically use it with a lot of brilliant gamesmanship aspects to it all.

[JockoManning]

You do that, while you still can. Reality is racing toward you at an increasing speed to disabuse you of your obsessive death grip on avoiding a false positive error at all costs.

[Boogieman]

Q-tards trying to tell other people about “reality” is quite funny. Keep it up.

[Sa-teef]

What I want to know is.......

When do they begin construction of "QTown" out in the jungles of Guyana?

[Windflier]

Yup all those lib articles and you claiming the exact same things You don't want to read them cause it proves you wrong

Proves me wrong? No, I said that I hadn't seen any MSM articles attacking Q, and that's true.

I get all my news right here at FR, and have never seen such anti-Q articles posted here. The screenshots you posted, are the first such articles I've seen.

So there it is. Take a win on showing a skeptic a different perspective.

[Windflier]

“Show me anything of comparable magnitude that has been produced by the Q community.”

The answer to that, oddly enough, is the global Q community, itself.

You have no idea how creepy that sounds to an outsider. Sorta like when Obama said, "We are the change we've been waiting for."

[bagster]

Q' might well be a Deep State psyop, put in place to misdirect,

Be a skeptic. Think Q's a Larp. Go ahead.

But to think the Deep State is intentionally revealing itself and all it's crimes over history, is probably one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.

Stick with your Larp fantasy, Windy. Your anti-Q cult is losing it, in the face of overwhelming evidence, if you ask me. It is becoming like a religion with you people.

At some point, you have to just say, alright Bagster. You were right.

When that day comes, I will welcome you to the fold, Windy. We shall fight this fight together, as brothers.

Bagster

[bagster]

I forget...was that before, or after Grandma broke her coccyx?

Haha. I think after. Not sure, though. Might have been during. She told Napolean to feed Tina, then left. As I recall. :)

Bagster