Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

While many homeowners with mortgages receive a federal tax deduction, no federal tax credit exists for renters. An analysis last year by the Washington, D.C.-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found the federal government spent $170 billion on housing tax benefits in 2017 — and that 90 percent went to subsidies for homeowners.


So when is it allowing an individual to keep his or her earned income and not taking it away through taxes considered a subsidy?

1 posted on 07/20/2018 6:03:13 AM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: artichokegrower

A tax deduction is different than a tax credit. I wouldn’t expect Sen. Harris to know the difference. Who do you think will be paying for those “tax credits”, Kamala? You dope...


2 posted on 07/20/2018 6:06:52 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

If we were talking about folks who make $40k a year and they spend near $1,500 a month on rent...maybe it makes sense.

But if we are talking about folks making $100k a year, living in San Francisco, and having to pay $6,000 a month to rent ‘something decent’....there’s something wrong here. I saw some interview of a guy in the Silicon Valley area and he was quoting near $5,500 for a fairly old and marginal 2-bedroom apartment.


3 posted on 07/20/2018 6:10:15 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

Job #1 needs to be to get rid of this mentality of looking to the Federal leviathan for answers to our problems.

As the great Ronald Reagan often said: “Government is not a solution to our problems, government is the problem. ... Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.”

MAFA! (Make America Free Again)


4 posted on 07/20/2018 6:10:27 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

Oh, so people can go get a better more expensive rental dwelling that’s now 60% of their income and subsidized. I think not Kam.

Here’s an idea, live within your means. If you’re of modest means, live in a modest dwelling.

Or even smarter, live below your means. I make a decent income and could afford a far better house. But to us, it’s four walls and a roof. ie; shelter. It’s not our image.

One thing I don’t understand about renting though. When we moved, we considered renting instead of buying but the cost to rent was far more than the monthly mortgage. We had just lost all of our equity plus $30 or 40,000 on our last house. We moved out of state during the recession (depression in Michigan) so our downpayment was only 10%.

It’s an amount that if we had to move, and our new house had no significant equity, we could walk away and not be devastated, so we bought a house.


6 posted on 07/20/2018 6:15:38 AM PDT by cyclotic ( WeÂ’re the first ones taxed, the last ones considered and the first ones punished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

They can call it the “landlord subsidy” act.


7 posted on 07/20/2018 6:16:49 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower
So when is it allowing an individual to keep his or her earned income and not taking it away through taxes considered a subsidy?

Kamala Harris: "Since you are a fascist and a racist, that's when!"

9 posted on 07/20/2018 6:17:16 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

I think of it as a subsidy to landlords. It will only serve to raise rents. It’s how capitalism teamed with free money from the government works.

i.e. if the average rent is $800 a month, and the government decides to give all renters $200 a month, you can expect the average rent to fairly quickly migrate to $1,000 a month.

i.e. it is as stupid as increasing the minimum wage.

The constitution says “promote the general welfare”. There is a gulf between the meanings of “promote” and provide. The former involves “providing” an environment that “promotes” the general welfare. The latter involves giving stuff to individuals. The latter is a very, VERY bad idea, as we’ve learned from the implementation of LBJ’s Great Society, not to mention all that FDR nonsense that extended and worsened the great depression.

The government needs to butt out and let markets do what they do.


12 posted on 07/20/2018 6:23:26 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

13 posted on 07/20/2018 6:24:23 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

And of course she fails to grasp that such a subsidy will lead to higher rents, they will not remain the same.

Subsidize something, get more of it. Penalize it, get less.

The left will never understand this basic truism, they bang their heads on it over and over and over again.


15 posted on 07/20/2018 6:29:54 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

Did anybody bother to explain to her that if her state didn’t tax the hell out of property owners the renters wouldn’t be paying such high rents in the first place?..............


17 posted on 07/20/2018 6:37:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

For many low income people who rent, their income is actually a taxpayer-provided payment formerly known as welfare. Some people who get multiple government (taxpayer) funds call it their “paycheck.” It appears by magic every month in their account, work free.


18 posted on 07/20/2018 6:38:43 AM PDT by Freee-dame (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

Sounds like a great deal for landowners!!

Kamala-you go girl!!!


19 posted on 07/20/2018 6:40:57 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

Harris is a dummy.


24 posted on 07/20/2018 7:03:50 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

Don’t we already non-voluntarily contribute to a plan like this? I think it’s called Section 8 Housing.


25 posted on 07/20/2018 7:04:46 AM PDT by upchuck (As we head to the midterms, please (re)read Confessions of Congressman X - tinyurl.com/congressmanx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower
California is a really fuc!ed up State. This State would spend billions on a train that will never be useful than increase water supply for life. And NY is just as bad. Two damn State that have failed as communism took over.
27 posted on 07/20/2018 7:12:31 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

Worst legislators booty call ever.

CC


28 posted on 07/20/2018 7:27:07 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Do you know what really burns my ass? A flame about 3 feet high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

sCam Harris.


29 posted on 07/20/2018 7:29:36 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

“While many homeowners with mortgages receive a federal tax deduction, no federal tax credit exists for renters. “

Mortgage interest deduction for owner allows him to charge lower rent thus renters that can’t itemize get some benefit unlike straight home owners.


30 posted on 07/20/2018 7:31:32 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

Did she just say blacks’ credit scores are so bad they can’t buy homes? That’s racist.


31 posted on 07/20/2018 7:35:44 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: artichokegrower

I pay more than 30% of our income to property tax. That’s not including insurance or maintenance or utilities.


32 posted on 07/20/2018 7:37:19 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson