[Stayfree]

The DNC is guilty of obstruction of justice, the FBI should not be allowed to rely upon any information provided by Crowdstrike because it has engaged by, controlled by and paid by the DNC. Therefore,because the FBI used questionable material to indict Russian citizens that it knows fully well CAN NOT by Russian law be extradited to the U.S. for trial, the whole bunch of indictments are a HUGE NOTHING BURGER. This is a huge witch hunt where there are no witches out there.

The Rod Rosenstein PR stunt on Friday and the DOJ announcement after the Trump/Putin summit meeting are sure signs that the Swamp is even more desperate to sink Trump...the timing of those 2 events required the timing of a lot of swamp creatures in the FBI and the DOJ.

The FBI and the DOJ are still obviously run be Swamp creatures and all of them must be ferreted out and fired!

[STJPII]

I don’t do criminal law and I understand the 12 will never stand trial but the admissibility of a 3rd party assessment seems doubtful to me

[Presbyterian Reporter]

On Tucker Carlson tonight I heard the DNC has destroyed all of their servers.

Was it not our FBI that allowed Hillary’s staff to keep their computers and phones without being inspected by the FBI?

Did not Hillary bleach her server even after a Congressional order to preserve data?

These are the reasons the American Public is having major problems believing Washington DC political hacks.

Trump is standing with the American Public and is using his power to force corrupt people to face sunlight.

The devil screams when exposed to sunlight.

[Chode]

same question i ask the day the indictments were announced

[Mr. K]

Good question...

[Chgogal]

And why did Mueller’s FBI allow Obama/Hillary to sell 20% of US’ uranium to Russia Russia Russia?

[Stevenc131]

There is the old saying a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, meaning a grand jury can be persuaded to indict anyone. In the case of the Russians, there will be no extradition, there will be no trials. Mueller will not have to present his case in front of judge or jury where ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ would apply. The indictments are worthless and only for show.

[TigersEye]

How Could the FBI Indict 12 Russians for Hacking the DNC When the FBI Never Saw the Server?

They are Deep State criminals who consider themselves above the law and that's my final answer, Regis!

[MosesKnows]

Very fishy indeed

Yes, especially since the FBI indicted no one. The special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election issued an indictment of 12 Russian...

[Let's Roll]

It’s never the nature of the evidence but the seriousness of the charge with these people.

[CurlyDave]

Can the 12 indictees hire a US based attorney and fight the indictment or demand discovery without appearing in person.

Mueller had this happen on one of his previous indictments and he is still fighting off that discovery.

I think this one could actually be similar, only better. Pointed questions about what happened to the server, and a demand to have their own experts examine it would be really interesting in a court.

I wonder if we could get up a legal defense fund for these guys?

I suspect the very best we could hope for would be to have the indictment dismissed, but that would still be a black eye for Mueller.

[Songcraft]

Debbie Woozyman Schultz assured the FBI's "Show-me Comey" that those 12 Russians (hereafter referred to as "The Dirty Russian Dozen") had done it, in nefarious collusion with Trump.   (If it's good enough for Homie-o Comey, it's...)

[knighthawk]

Mueller knows these 12 will not stand trail so he can make up anything he wants.

[trebb]

Because someone the Dems paid told them it was so.......convenient....no?

[Ann Archy]

THIS needs to be in the SIDEBAR so more people are aware of these facts!! PLEASE PUT IT IN THE SIDEBAR!