Posted on 07/14/2018 7:09:43 AM PDT by SMGFan
....Where is the DNC Server, and why didn’t the FBI take possession of it? Deep State?
The stories you heard about the 12 Russians yesterday took place during the Obama Administration, not the Trump Administration. Why didn’t they do something about it, especially when it was reported that President Obama was informed by the FBI in September, before the Election?
6:08 AM - 14 Jul 2018
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1018074723140427776
SPOT ON, Mr President
OK, Wray, Roddy, Jeffy . . . PETER . . . Ughlee Lisa . . . anyone?
It’s not the server you want. It’s the hard drives inside. Along with backups.
Of course those have long been destroyed or “mysteriously” disappeared.
Just axin'.
The responses to that tweet are telling. Atypical lib trolls.
One of them, however, shows a post by Q that “we have the server”...a curious reference itself, but to Five Eyes as well.
Where did Mueller get the evidence the 12 Russians he indicted actually hacked these Computers when the FBI has NEVER SEEN OR EXAMINED THEM????
The Parade is on TV right now TV5 a french channel
The FBI apparently didn’t think to seize it after they were informed it had been hacked. They took the word of Hillary’s hand picked IT techs who were told to say it was the Russians.
If a real crime had been committed that involved foreign agents, the FBI would not have let the DNC or Hillary keep it. They would have assigned a forensic team.
They were told to stand down. They were Ordered by Obama not to investigate. Why? Because there was a lot of evidence of High Crimes And Misdemeanors they didn’t want uncovered.
Occam’s Razor.
The leadership of the FBI didn’t want to know what was on that server. That didn’t want to know anything that could hurt Hillary. They didn’t want to know anything that might force them to act against those who put them in power, and who they thought would keep them there.
At this point any secrets the server may have held will have been sanitized. Easy to do. If it is found it will magically be transformed from containing damning evidence to proof of innocence. Rosenweasel flanked the GOP with his little show yesterday. Idiots.
“”””Where did Mueller get the evidence the 12 Russians he indicted actually hacked these Computers when the FBI has NEVER SEEN OR EXAMINED THEM????””””
Exactly. I am waiting for someone with technical expertise to explain how the DOJ can make these claims without possessing the servers that were breached.
Thus far there is a lot of silence on the web.
The Mule simply repeated Crowdstrike and plagiarized George Webb. Pathetic ;(
July 14th.
No question that evidence has been destroyed. In my e-book on “collusion” I cover the Awans.
From my perspective, the DNC hacking and the Awan scandal are 2 cases which do not meet the definition of “investigations”.
Rather, they meet the definition of cover up.
The all-too-important question: Why?
Plus, cui bono?
But the events under indictment took place during the Obama Administration.
Why did the Obamatons keep it secret?
Even after it was reported that then-Pres Obama was informed by the FBI in Sept, before the 2016 Election?
What does Obummer know that we dont know?
And BTW....where are the govt-issue WH computers Obama stole when he exited?
========================================
THE HIGH LEVEL COLLUSION WAS PALPABLE--- Michael Goodwin in the Sunday NY Post said it best:
"Hillary (a) paid for, and, (b) created allegations against Trump. She then (c) gave them to L/E, (d) then tipped friendly media to the investigation."
"And it is almost certain corrupted FBI agents supporting Clinton were among the anonymous sources......."
"The Clinton connections are so fundamental that there probably would not have been an FBI investigation without her involvement."
" Hillary played the dirtiest trick in presidential history; she is revealed as relentlessly ruthless in her quest for power."
The only thing that went wrong (in her eyes) is that she lost the election."
SOURCE Feb 11 NYP----GOODWIN OPINION
https://nypost.com/2018/02/10/peeling-back-the-layers-of-hillary-clintons-deceit/
TITLE Peeling back the layers of Hillary Clinton’s deceit
=========================================
ACTION NOW
Contact President Trump:
Tel Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
email. president@whitehouse.gov
WH CONTACT PAGE https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
Contact Jeff Sessions
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Comment Line: 202-353-1555
Switchboard: 202-514-2000
A few questions for Special Counsel Mueller. S/C Investigations normally pursue a crime.
<><> What crime are you investigating?
<><> Your job description centered on Russian collusion, what statute in the US code would you use to prosecute collusion?
<><> Your investigative team is composed of highly partisan supporters of Hillary Clinton? Did you seek out independent, non-partisan lawyers?
<><> Russia expert, Fanny Ohr, wife of demoted DOJ official Bruce Ohr, who worked for Fusion GPS on the Steele dossier acquired a short-wave radio license about that time? Did the FBI monitor any of Ohr’s electronic communications?
<><> 2016 candidate Hillary Clinton as Secy of State, removed boxes of official documents and destroyed more than 30,000 official emails. Did you know about this?
<><> What was the Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton meeting about, aside from the usual pleasantries?
<><> The FBI sought to identify and discipline the agent who made the Lynch-Clinton meeting public. Is that official FBI policy.
<><> Former CIA boss John Brennan is making angry statements about Pres Donald Trump. Would you have hired him at the FBI? If so, in what capacity?
<><> When reporters asked you if the FBI had dropped the ball by failing to act, you said, “No. I think, given the context of the discussions and the situation that the agents and the analysts were looking at, they took appropriate steps.”
<><> Any second thoughts on that?
<><> Given the time and money you have put in, does the the absence of any crime or collusion trouble you?
<><> Are Democrats disappointed in you?
<><> If so, how have they acted against you?
<><> Did you resent it when Cong Schiff who based has his political career on your finding Russian collision called you a little ****?
<><> Can you account for every penny of the $17 million taxpayers were forced to pay for this phony investigation?
The newly appointed National Archivist has previously told congress of this fact: MUCH of BO’B archive information which had previously been inventoried is now missing from the National Archives. Sandy Berger’s socks?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.