Posted on 07/13/2018 5:13:25 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Peter Strzok admitted to Congress on Thursday that he “detested” Donald Trump and was rooting for Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election.
“You were both rooting for Hillary Clinton to win and you both detested Donald Trump, were you not?” Republican Ohio Rep. Steve Chabot asked Strzok during a joint congressional hearing.
“I think that’s fair to say,” said Strzok.
While acknowledging his animus to Trump, Strzok insisted in Thursday’s hearing that bias did not affect his work on the Trump-Russia investigation. Strzok led the investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government as deputy chief of counterintelligence at the FBI.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Not gonna happen.
The detestable detest’s. Geez, this guy is a real piece of work. Classic Democrat.
UNTOUCHABLE except by Arkancide.
You know who else is watching these dishonorable POS FBI clowns testify? The Mob.
My wife is an investigator. If she even knows a friend or relatives of a target she turns it over to someone else. This has really exposed how biased the government is against us.
Even CNN admits he's biased (CNN Anchor Admits Strzok Texts Are ‘So Damning’).
I don't know how many Democrats watched that CNN piece, but you can bet that some of those who did are now curious about the #walkaway movement.
So, let me get this straight... our “justice” system is arranged so that if you go into court somewhere as a jurist and rail on how you hate X, Y or Z, you will be disqualified from judging those cases because you’re biased. However, if you spew venomous hatred of Republicans, that’s not supposed to in any way interfere with your work on various committees that are investigating events that could well impact a Presidential election.
These are the kinds of people who fabricated evidence and frame people.
Excellent point!
His facial expressions are saying, "yeah, I despise Trump...and I did everything I could to remove him."
"And eff you, Trump supporters. You'll never do a damn thing about it."
However, I am not biased in any way.
12 Jul: NY Post Editorial: Peter Strzok is absolutely shameless
Heck, The New York Times didn’t even wait for him to say Word One before posting a story headlined, “FBI Agent at Center of Russia Probe Turns Tables on GOP.”
But then, the Times knew Strzok planned to say that the mere fact of his being questioned is a “victory notch in Putin’s belt.”...
https://nypost.com/2018/07/12/peter-strzok-is-absolutely-shameless/
This is why defense attorneys don’t want their clients on the stand. Strzok is an out and out psychopath.
“How is it possible to “detest” someone and still claim to have no bias against that person?”
By redefining bias in his deranged mind. A narcissist would do this and insist that his definition is correct.
It was said at the hearing, you are a liar. It is worth repeating, you are a liar.
You got it.
What a lying, adulterous POS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.